SOM training/t​esting-sim​-trainr

2012 3 5
1 个回答
回答已采纳
3 次查看（30 天）

0 个投票

I want to differentiate 3 sets of data, using SOFM. I am getting very absurd results. Sometimes the sample hits reverses. Are we supposed to use the 'sim' command to test a network? if yes, then even the data that is being used to train the network, when simulated, doesn't give more than 20-40% accuracy. How to go about it? Where could have I gone wrong?Does topology make a difference?I am using dimensions as [3] only, since 3 sets are there Also, I used wavelet decomposition to process my data, and selected some coefficients. Please Help.
PS: I am using trainr(by default from GUI - nntool). Thanking you in advance.

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论 隐藏 -1更早的评论

greatest
greatest 2012-3-7
Please also explain me the role of learning fnc, ordering phase etc. Why should they be important? Is Hit-and-trial the best method to set these parameters?

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

 采纳的回答

Greg Heath
Greg Heath 2012-3-7

0 个投票

SOFM is not meant for classification. Therefore Kohonen extended it to LVQ (lvqnet).
However, the MLP (newff, patternnet) and RBF (newrb) and are based on universal approximators and, for me, are preferrable.
Hope this helps.
Greg

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论 隐藏 -1更早的评论

greatest
greatest 2012-3-7
Thank you sir.
This shall benefit me. The only thing that bugs me is that I am following a paper on this project, and they have used newsom fnc. to classify the data. I am goin to follow your technique though.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Deep Learning Toolbox 的更多信息

产品

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by