definite integral in matlab

Question

SOHRAB ALAM 2012-3-18

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/32608-definite-integral-in-matlab

回答： Moses 2023-11-1

I want definite integral of equations c2 and pout as-:

z = ((1/gamma(m))*((m/T).^m))*(1/log10(2))
f = (y.^(m-1))*(log10(1+y))*(exp((-m*y)/T))
c2=z*int(f,0,2);
pout=((1/gamma(m))*((m/T).^m))*int(f,0,yth);%outage probability

and please give me help for definite integral in matlab theoretically also if possible.

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论隐藏 -1更早的评论

Walter Roberson 2012-3-18

We need to know which variable you wish to integrate f over.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Dev-iL 2012-3-18

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/32608-definite-integral-in-matlab#answer_41185

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Hello,

Generally, if you want to calculate some integral analytically, you can use symbolic math. Here's an example:

syms x y
z=2*x+y+4;

If you want to know the antiderivative use:

Z=int(z,x)
Z =
 (2*x + y + 4)^2/4

Then you can evaluate this function at the limits using:

subs(Z,x,<value to put instead of 'x'>)

or if you want to just get the result without going through the antiderivative, simply use:

Z=int(z,x,<lower bound>,<upper bound>)

Alternatively, if you want to calculate the integral numerically, you can use the MATLAB function quad (you can read about it in the MATLAB help files).

.

I hope this helps you,

Iliya.

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

请先登录，再进行评论。

Answer 2

Walter Roberson 2012-3-18

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/32608-definite-integral-in-matlab#answer_41191

If your variable of integration is y, and m and T are to remain symbolic (no definite value given for them before the integration), then you will have trouble finding an analytic integral. You effectively have a y^m term as part of f, and the integral of that part can look very different depending on m (especially m=0 or m=-1)

There is a transform you can do (in Maple at least) that converts the integral into an infinite sum. Not that it does you much good as you end up having to evaluate the infinite sum numerically. And the transform turns out not to be valid if m is integral.

Matters become much easier if you are given m before you do the integration.

If your m are strictly positive integer, then you might be able to work out the pattern. I can see that there is a pattern, but the rule for the the coefficients of the polynomials involved are not obvious.