I have a problem with simulink because when run the program:

Error in port widths or dimensions. Invalid dimension has been specified for input port 5 of 'Model_MGDL/Subsystem/Sum'

1 个评论

Error in port widths or dimensions. Invalid dimension has been specified for input port 5 of 'Model_MGDL/Subsystem/Sum'.
Error in port widths or dimensions. Output port 1 of 'Model_MGDL/Subsystem/C' is a [8x8] matrix.

请先登录,再进行评论。

 采纳的回答

Making corrections to the observations that made me, even so I have problems, my inputs are 8x1 and 8x8 and still I do not allow me to perform the correct process, which I still do wrong :(

1 个评论

If you have an 8 x 1 input and an 8 x 8 input, then what is the desired result? Should each row of the 8 x 1 be replicated into 8 x 8 and that added to the 8 x 8 ? Simulink does not know to do that: if you want inputs to be replicated then you have to do that with a separate block.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(6 个)

Your Constant block is 1 x 4. Your output of Add1 is 8 x 8. You are trying to add the two together with a Sum block. What output are you expecting?

3 个评论

Yes, but I do not know how to add the matrix signal even though it is of different magnitude
Is the mathematical model of a system of 4 degrees of freedom
Ignoring the Simulink portion of it for a moment: What is the mathematical formula for your desired outcome for adding a 1 x 4 vector to an 8 x 8 array.
For example, is your desired outcome to replicate the 1 x 4 vector once per row, taking [A B C D] to [A B C D A B C D], and then to replicate that 8 times, so you get
[A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D
A B C D A B C D]
and add that to your 8 x 8 Matrix?
Or should the 1 x 4 be reshaped to 2 x 2, and then that replicated as needed:
A B A B A B A B
C D C D C D C D
A B A B A B A B
C D C D C D C D
A B A B A B A B
C D C D C D C D
A B A B A B A B
C D C D C D C D
and that should be added to the 8 x 8?
Or should it be be
A A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C
D D D D D D D D
A A A A A A A A
B B B B B B B B
C C C C C C C C
D D D D D D D D
added to the 8 x 8?
or something else?

请先登录,再进行评论。

I tried with a simpler cycle and still do not do it, I do not know if I'm messing with the integrator or what it is
The simple model and the firts model

3 个评论

In Subsystem3, input #1 is C, an 8 x 8 matrix. You pass that matrix to several Fcn blocks. Fcn1 for example is coded as -36*u(1) . That is a problem because u is not a scalar or vector, and "General Expression blocks" only permit scalar or vector inputs. You either need to switch to MATLAB Function Block for those, or you need to use a reshape to reshape the 8 x 8 into a vector.
When I look at the subsystem, I see that you only ever use u(1) of the 8x8 blocks. That leads me to wonder why you are sending the entire block in, instead of selecting only the one value and passing that in?
I use fnc blocks because later I need to run the program with different values and that will make it easier to modify it, or block instead of fnc recommend me to replace it or how?
You may wish to recode as MATLAB Function Blocks
function y = fcn(u)
y = -36*u(1,1);
end
and the like.

请先登录,再进行评论。

I made the arrays to u (1,1 |) in the matrix blocks and now it appears:
Error while parsing expression: 36*u(1,1) in 'Model_MGDL_P1/Subsystem/C/C/Subsystem/Subsystem3/Fcn1' token "," was found, where as ")" was expected

1 个评论

You cannot use 2D subscripts in an arithmetic block. That is why I was talking about MATLAB Function Blocks: they can have general MATLAB code.

请先登录,再进行评论。

Hi, i resolved my problem but i have a new problem with the model:
An error occurred while running the simulation and the simulation was terminated
Derivative of state '4' in block 'Model_MGDL/Subsystem/Integrator' at time 0.59593389906600114 is not finite. The simulation will be stopped. There may be a singularity in the solution. If not, try reducing the step size (either by reducing the fixed step size or by tightening the error tolerances

1 个评论

Your Matrix Inversion is probably failing. Matrix inversion is fragile. At the very least you should consider using https://www.mathworks.com/help/dsp/ref/pseudoinverse.html
Probably reformulating as a matrix division instead of multiplying by inverse would be less fragile than what you have now, but pinv would be less fragile than that. You should also consider using a MATLAB Function Block in order to be able to use the \ operator if you are using discrete time instead of continuous time.

请先登录,再进行评论。

I already considered other methods of inverse and sends me the same error

1 个评论

Well, create a new Question for this and post the model there.
Note: to reply to what someone else has posted, click on "Comment on this Answer" instead of creating a new Answer.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

帮助中心File Exchange 中查找有关 Event Functions 的更多信息

产品

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by