Different Coverage for after(1, sec) and after(1, msec). My misunderstanding or just a bug?
2 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi,
Simple model is made up for coverage calculation.
State_A <--after(1, sec) --> State_B
In above, the transition is bidirectional. the decision coverage is 100%, and it makes sense since after(1, sec) is evaluated true/false according to time.
if 'sec' is changed to 'msec', then it produces 50% coverage, and the report message is
"Transition "after(1, msec)" from "A" to "B"
after(1, msec) was never false."
Why is that?
Thanks.
0 个评论
回答(1 个)
Arunkumar M
2018-11-9
编辑:Arunkumar M
2018-11-9
What was your step size used in simulation? This could happen when your step size is higher than 1msec as used in this condition.
0 个评论
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Verification, Validation, and Test 的更多信息
产品
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!