Different Coverage for after(1, sec) and after(1, msec). My misunderstanding or just a bug?

1 次查看（过去 30 天）
Seungkyu Park
Seungkyu Park 2017-3-27
编辑： Arunkumar M 2018-11-9
Hi,
Simple model is made up for coverage calculation.
State_A <--after(1, sec) --> State_B
In above, the transition is bidirectional. the decision coverage is 100%, and it makes sense since after(1, sec) is evaluated true/false according to time.
if 'sec' is changed to 'msec', then it produces 50% coverage, and the report message is
"Transition "after(1, msec)" from "A" to "B"
after(1, msec) was never false."
Why is that?
Thanks.

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（1 个）

Arunkumar M
Arunkumar M 2018-11-9
编辑：Arunkumar M 2018-11-9
What was your step size used in simulation? This could happen when your step size is higher than 1msec as used in this condition.

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Verification, Validation, and Test 的更多信息

标签

产品

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by