kmeans appear to miss obvious clusters
14 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I am struggling to get kmeans to identify what appear to be fairly distinct clusters in my data. I've walked through the documentation and examples but can't improve over the images shown below (raw data plotted first followed by the kmeans result, data also attached). I've tried the different distance and start options without much success. Even giving seed values doesn't improve the clustering. Does anyone have any other suggestions I could try? My goal is to end up with each data point falling into one of 3 clusters. My last command was:
[cidx3,cmeans2] = kmeans(X,3,'dist','cosine','display','iter','Start',seeds);
where
seeds =
[0.018660 872 17.59;
0.002100 1140 18.88;
0.004652 1187 34.82]
Thank you
1 个评论
Adam
2017-7-7
It would help if you plotted the seeds visibly on the graph. It's not very easy to see where a point is in 3d just from coordinates.
采纳的回答
Ilya
2017-7-7
Do this (assuming there are no nan's in X):
[cidx3,cmeans2] = kmeans(zscore(X),3,'dist','cosine','display','iter');
Did it get better? If yes, look at your data again and think about what went wrong in your previous attempts. Look at the scales. Plot it using real scales 1:1. Think about how the cosine distance works when the data are shifted far away from zero.
更多回答(1 个)
Image Analyst
2017-7-7
You might want to normalize your data.
I don't think it's good to try to find clusters when one parameter goes from 0 to 1500 and another goes from 0 to 0.05 !!!
With these ranges, your data is basically in a skinny flat sheet, not a 3-D widely spread out space.
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!