Function Iteration for n times, but n is NOT a fixed number

2 次查看（过去 30 天）
Pierre Deligne
Pierre Deligne 2017-9-29
评论： Pierre Deligne 2017-10-12
I want to achieve this:
v, x are parameters, n is a variable. I want to define l(n) as a function of n by iteration. l(n) can be an implicit function/expression, as long as Matlab knows what l(n) is, and can call l(n) within other functions any time I want. But n is NOT a fixed number.
syms n v x
l(0) = 1 / sqrt(gamma(v + 1));
l(1) = (1 + v - x) / sqrt(gamma(v + 2));
for i = 2:n
l(i) = (v + 2 * i - 1 - x) / sqrt(i * (v + i)) * l(i - 1) - sqrt((v + i - 1) * (i - 1) / (v + i) / i) * l(i - 2);
end
Thank you!

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（2 个）

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2017-10-6
编辑：Walter Roberson 2017-10-6
This is not possible with symfun(). symfun() cannot be recursive.
The syntax of symfun for 1 variable is
output = symfun(expression, variablename)
This follows standard MATLAB calling sequence, so expression is fully evaluated without binding the given variable as a dummy parameter, and the result is what is passed into symfun, which will then bind the variable name as the dummy parameter for whatever symbolic expression it got.
For example,
syms x
f = symfun(mod(x,1), x)
is the equivalent of
syms x
temp = mod(x,1);
f = symfun(temp, x)
It happens that mod(x,1) applied to symbolic variable x is defined as 0. This is not the same
f = @(x) mod(x, 1)
which defers evaluation of x until it is passed an argument.
You can get a fraction of the way there using piecewise(), but anonymous functions have no way to refer to themselves, so you cannot do the equivalent of
f(x,y) = piecewise(x == 1, SOMETHING(y), x == 2, SOMETHING_ELSE(y), SELF(x-1, y)*A_THIRD_THING(x,y) )
The only way to do anything like this for symbolic functions is to not use symfun or equivalent, and instead build some careful MuPAD code -- and being very careful about how it is evaluated and even more so about how it is displayed (error messages are typical if you accidentally try to display MuPAD code inside MATLAB.)
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2017-10-6
I would suggest to you that your assigned value in your for loop should be l(i) rather than l(n) . If that change is made then you would have a recurrence equation; https://www.mathworks.com/help/symbolic/mupad_ref/rec.html . Unfortunately no direct MATLAB interface is provided to that MuPAD functionality; also, it is difficult to come up with a closed form for that equation.
I do not think the item you linked to has any relevance here.
The code would be easy to express as a MATLAB function, since MATLAB functions are able to refer to themselves. Also, if you are using R2017a or later, you could take advantage of memoize() to reduce the computation.
Pierre Deligne
Pierre Deligne 2017-10-12
Hi Mr. Roberson. Thanks for your great help! I have made significant improvement following your guide. But the code still contains error. Please redirect to this page:
https://cn.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/360971-matlab-calling-functions-from-mupad-notebooks
and help me with the error. Thank you very much!

请先登录，再进行评论。

Stefan Wehmeier
Stefan Wehmeier 2017-10-9
Why don't you make your last source code the body of a function? Is l at any time called with non-constant argument, such that you need to use it as a symbol? If yes, you have to write a function that, for constant integer arguments, does the loop you have given; and returns a call to a symfun otherwise.
This is a classical case where you would use "option remember" in MuPAD. Your definition of l(i) invokes two recursive calls, each of which invokes two recursive calls again etc. Thus Walter's piecewise could run into efficiency problems. If you wanted to emulate this behavior in MATLAB, you would need a persistent variable containing an array of all previously computed results.

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Common Operations 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!