sum of matrix omitting one dimension
3 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi, I would like to ask how I could sum over a n dimensional matrix except one dimension, so the output is a vector. The ndims are not known in forehand. The summation is giving always a vector. (In my case a marginal pdf in statistics). Something like sum(K(:) except i-th dimension)
The best in a cyclus ( ndims not known).
For example having matrix K, the sums would be [6 22], [12 16], [10 18]
K(:,:,1) =
0 1
2 3
K(:,:,2) =
4 5
6 7
3 个评论
采纳的回答
Stephen23
2017-11-2
编辑:Stephen23
2017-11-2
Here is one very simple way:
>> d = 3; % dimension
>> v = 1:ndims(K);
>> v([1,d]) = v([d,1]);
>> s = sum(reshape(permute(K,v),size(K,d),[]),2)
s =
6
22
It works by swapping the first and the desired dimension, then reshaping so that all trailing dimensions are reduced to one. The sum is then trivially along each row.
Note that the method I show here also has the significant advantage that it does not create any variables with copies of the data from the input array: this will be important for scaling to larger input arrays. Also note that slow and complex arrayfun or cellfun are not required for this task!
4 个评论
Stephen23
2017-11-2
@Rafael Schwarzenegger: the dimensions of the input array are automatically measured using ndims(K).
更多回答(1 个)
Cedric
2017-11-2
Here is one way, but there is probably a simpler approach:
buffer = arrayfun(@(k) permute(KL, circshift(1:ndims(KL), k-1)), 1:ndims(KL), 'UniformOutput', false) ;
s = cellfun(@(M) sum(reshape(M, [], size(M,2))), buffer, 'UniformOutput', false) ;
where s is a cell array of sum vectors.
EDIT : I won't have time, but maybe you can see how dimensions work with SHIFTDIM and understand how to have the outputs ordered as needed:
buffer = arrayfun(@(k) shiftdim(KL, k-1), 1:ndims(KL), 'UniformOutput', false) ;
s = cellfun(@(M) sum(reshape(M, [], size(M,2))), buffer, 'UniformOutput', false) ;
PS : you'll have to test whether it really does what you need. The approach is based on the fact that MATLAB reads memory column first
4 个评论
Cedric
2017-11-2
As mentioned by Stephen, arrayfun and cellfun are not necessary. They are hidden loops and I used them for conciseness. You can build a FOR loop if you prefer, and again, as Stephen mentions it would have the advantage not to require storing copies of your data (if you are dealing with large arrays).
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Matrix Indexing 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!