Correct samples for HDL Optimized QPSK Receiver with Captured Data
显示 更早的评论
I am experimenting with the HDL Optimized QPSK Receiver design (commqpskrxhdl). I am replacing the captured data input (cdfq) with the IQ output of the TX part of the 'QPSK Transmitter and Receiver' example (commqpsktxrx). The design does not seem to compensate correctly, according to the 'after timing recovery' plot.
Here is the output of the original commqpskrxhdl design

And here is the output using the transmitted data from commqpsktxrx:

What is the reason for this inconsistency? Should I be expecting to see the same output?
采纳的回答
更多回答(1 个)
Jeff Edward
2019-2-18
0 个投票
Is there a solution/fix for this issue? Because the sample time at the receiver ADC is arbitrary and there's a 50% probability that it will be an odd numbered delay.
I've had do do a workaround by having a parallel path with 1 sample delay, and then calculating the CRC for both paths and using the correct path depending on the CRC match. Obviously this approach is a brute force method that is computationally inefficient.
Is this a fundamental limitation of the zero crossing TED or an implementation issue or am I missing something here?
The link you gave seems to be incompatible with HDL. Any suggestions?
Thank you,
Jeff.
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 QPSK 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!
