Don't answer your own question just to add information.
I've moved your answer into a comment. Use comment to make a comment. Or edit your own question.
"Attached is my modified m file (2 instances) that corrects my original problem. The original problem was attempting to reconcile the cumulative sum of the square of the Fourier coefficients with the integral of the square of the "idealized" waveform function. The cause of the problem is due to both parameters w & T. Both w & T factor in computation of the Fourier coefficients, Ck, lines 35 to 41 in the original m file. w also factors in the integration bounds of the square of the "idealized" waveform function, line 55 in the original m file.
Realizing that the summation of the Fourier coefficients squared must asymptotically approach a finite value which corresponds to integral of the square of the "idealized" waveform function a correction factor, R, is computed in the new m file, line 61. Applying this correction factor in line 62 now reconciles the discrepancy.
After applying this correction I then double-checked the results against other modifications to computing the Fourier coefficients. So I commented out lines 34 through 41 & uncommented lines 16 through 21 and ran the 2nd instance of "peakpress2.m". Now I have a slight discrepancy in comparing the results of q against Q. They will not be identically equal, but should concur within probably 6 significant figures. I am hoping a DEBUGGING GURU might help resolve this discrepancy."
