How to improve the speed of computing trace in my code?
2 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Hi all,
In my code there is a key function which cost the majority of computational power due to the large number of repetitive computations. Imagine I have 2 cell arrays 'respi' and 'respj' which contains results of SVD vectors:
>> respi
respi =
1×10 cell array
Columns 1 through 9
{3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell} {3×1 cell}
Column 10
{3×1 cell}
>> respi{1}
ans =
3×1 cell array
{242×5 double}
{ 5×5 double}
{ 3×5 double}
I have a function which takes respi and respj, compute and store the trace as follows
function otpt = uTuPartDemo(respi, respj)
otpt = zeros(length(respi), length(respj));
for iTr = 1:length(respi)
u1 = respi{iTr}; % find the ith cell element.
for jTr = 1:length(respj)
u2 = respj{jTr}; % find the jth cell element
otpt(iTr, jTr) = ... % compute the trace.
trace((u2{3}' * u1{3}) * u1{2}' * (u1{1}' * u2{1}) * u2{2});
end
end
And I need to run this function repetitively for many times as follows:
for i = 1:n % very large number, say n = 100000
otpt = uTuPartDemo(respi, respj);
end
How can I improve the speed and efficiency of function uTuPartDemo? Many thanks!
0 个评论
回答(1 个)
Pieter Hamming
2018-6-20
Presumably the trace calculation takes most time. Since you're only interested in the diagonals anyway, why not use the approach explained here. It should reduce your computational strain.
A minor other issue: you don't need to define u1 and u2. Instead of
u1 = respi{iTr};
u1{3}
Just use
respi{iTr}{3}
It will save you a minor amount of memory.
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Logical 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!