As I already explained to you, because you have
y = [ 3/2, x^2 + y(x)^2, 2*x + 2*y(x)*diff(y(x), x), 2*diff(y(x), x)^2 + 2*y(x)*diff(y(x), x, x) + 2]
then the y on the left side refers to the same thing as the y on the right side, and so y(x) on the right side signifies array indexing. Your y vector is 5 elements long, so the only valid values of x for this would be 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. Each y(x) would resolve to a numeric scalar value, and diff() of a numeric scalar value is empty. Any operation involving an empty array returns an empty array, so all of the entries except the first two are going to disappear, leaving you only [3/2, x^2 + y(x)^2] to work with for preliminary consistency.
Now, with that subset, can x = 1 be made self-consistent? That would require that y(1) be 3/2, which seems plausible. With the subset, can x = 2 be made self-consistent? That would require that y(2) = x^2 + y(x)^2 = 2^2 + y(2)^2 . Rewriting as z = 4 + z^2 we can see that has only complex roots 1/2-1i*sqrt(15)*(1/2), 1/2+1i*sqrt(15)*(1/2) . Is that acceptable, to force y(2) to be complex valued?