parfor slower than for in my code.

3 次查看（过去 30 天）
pb
pb 2018-12-10
评论： pb 2018-12-11
Hi,
My code is the following
parfor nn=1:Na
temp=A{nn}*B{nn};
temp(1,1) = 0; temp(Nb,1) = 0;
D(nn,:)=((C{nn}\temp));
end
Where A ,C are cell arrays storing Na number of sparse matrices-(NbxNb), B is a cell array storing Na vectors of Nbx1 size
I am finding that my above loop is faster when i use 'for' loop instead of 'parfor' loop. Does anyone know why? (assume that I am only intrested in the reason for-' the code being slower with parfor compared to for'.)
Thank you.
  2 个评论
Steven Lord
Steven Lord 2018-12-10
What are typical values for Na and Nb in your application?
pb
pb 2018-12-10
Hi Steven,
Na and Nb are order of 10^3

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2018-12-10
For sufficiently large matrices the * operation is handled by high performance multi threaded library that uses all available cores. When you parfor then by default each worker gets one core so in each worker the high performance library operates in effective serial . You have several of those serial operation at the same time but each one takes more clock time than the original multithreaded operation. It is at best equivalent total time but probably worse since your number of cores used in multithreaded mode might exceed your parpool size.
... and meanwhile each parpool worker is aa separate process that has to be created and be set up to run MATLAB . It is certain that you will have that overhead when you parfor so parfor is often slower than not using parfor.
parfor wins under two circumstances:
  1. the code would not be automatically parallelized with the high performance library , such as if the arrays are too small or the operation does not match an implemented pattern . In such a case you still have the overhead of creating the workers but you can get several done in the same clock time
  2. the code involves waiting for external resources such as disk or network . In such aa case with multiple workers some could be making progress while others are waiting which is better than having the cpus sit idle for every wait.
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
Edric Ellis
Edric Ellis 2018-12-11
Further to Walter's answer, parfor can also win if you have a MATLAB Distributed Computing Server cluster available. In that case, you can have more computational resources available to you than those in your desktop computer.
pb
pb 2018-12-11
Thank you Edric for the comment. I am trying computing on cluster now.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Parallel for-Loops (parfor) 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2018b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by