Circularly exclude elements.

13 次查看（过去 30 天）
Abhijit Chowdhary
评论： Abhijit Chowdhary 2019-4-8
Hello all,
I'm trying to compactly write a line of code for a interesting program I'm working on. Fixing , suppose we have the following code:
x = 1:n;
non_adj = zeros(n,n-2);
for k=1:n
non_adj(k,:) = []; %in here comes the confusion
end
In non_adj(k,:) I would like to fill in x without the elements k-1 and k+1. However, these elements are regarded circularily, i.e. if I have , then I want (order of elements irrelevant). I know I can do this with if statements handling the cases, but I was wondering if you all had a nicer way to one liner the construction.
I attempted the following construction
non_adj(k,:) = [k, k+2:mod(k-3,n)+1, mod(k+1,n)+1:k-2];
However this fails, for example, where . The above would construct the array , where in fact I wanted .
Do you have any ideas? If it helps, the context is that I'm trying to construct a vertex set minus the neighbors of vertex k, which happen to be (circularily shifted for ).
EDIT: I've realized I could use set differencing, i.e.: (however, you still might come up with better ideas).
non_adj(k,:) = setdiff([1:n], 1 + [mod(k-2,n) mod(k,n)]);
  2 个评论
madhan ravi
madhan ravi 2019-4-7
explicitly state your desired output
Abhijit Chowdhary
Abhijit Chowdhary 2019-4-7
编辑：Abhijit Chowdhary 2019-4-7
If , then I want . If , then I want . Otherwise I want , and I'm hoping for a one-line to cover these scenarios.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

David Goodmanson
David Goodmanson 2019-4-7
Hi Abhijit,
try
x = 1:n;
x(mod([k-1 k+1]-1,n)+1) = []
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
David Goodmanson
David Goodmanson 2019-4-8
编辑：David Goodmanson 2019-4-8
Hi Abhijit,
I thought that for a given k, you wanted to keep k, exclude k-1 and k+1 and keep the rest of them, doing so in a circular fashion. Could you give me a quick example of where the code above doesn't work? I am having trouble finding one (n.b. both lines of code have to be run for each new value of k).
Abhijit Chowdhary
Abhijit Chowdhary 2019-4-8
Ah, no it's my fault, you're right. I did not realize that x was being changed when you do this, and blindly continued to test on it. Yes, this indeed works, thanks!

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Matrix Indexing 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2018b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by