Is there any way to smoothly switch between two trackers?

1 次查看（过去 30 天）
Myana Anderson
Myana Anderson 2019-5-28
评论： Elad Kivelevitch 2019-6-3
I am trying to switch the central tracker in this Sensor Fusion and Tracking toolbox example, Multiplatform Radar Detection Fusion:
https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/examples/multi-platform-radar-detection-fusion.html
from trackerGNN to trackerTOMHT but have been struggling to do so. Simply changing the function name along with its arguments is not enough. I've gone into the given helper functions as well to switch the parameters from trackerGNN specific ones to trackerTOMHT ones, but this doesn't do anything either.
I understand that GNN and TOMHT are both structurally different in terms of how they find predictions, so I can see why simply changing a few variables wouldn't be enough but I can't figure out where else to go.

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Elad Kivelevitch
Elad Kivelevitch 2019-5-31
Hi Myana,
The example: https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/examples/tracking-closely-spaced-targets-under-ambiguity.html shows how to switch between trackerGNN, trackerJPDA, and trackerTOMHT.
You are right that the three trackers are somewhat different and therefore have some differences between them, but we have tried to keep the names of properties that serve the same purpose the same across different trackers. Additionally, we tried to keep the inputs and outputs the same across the trackers.
At this time, I am assuming that you might be running into difficulty converting the history-based confirmation and deletion thresholds of the trackerGNN to the score-based confirmation and deletion thresholds of the trackerTOMHT. If that is the case, please consider looking at the example https://www.mathworks.com/help/fusion/examples/introduction-to-track-logic.html that provides an introduction to both track logics.
It may be a good idea to first use the score-based confirmation and deletion logic in the trackerGNN, and configure it to work well, and only then to convert to the trackerTOMHT.
Alternatively, consider using the trackerJPDA (from R2019a) with track history logic. It may provide a solution for your use case.
HTH,
Elad
  2 个评论
Myana Anderson
Myana Anderson 2019-6-3
Thank you for your answer! I ended up using some of the variables/arguments in the second example you linked for the problem I was working on which I think worked. However I didn't use anything to convert the history-based logic to the score-based logic which makes me believe I missed something? But even then I wouldn't know how to do that for trackerTOMHT because it doesn't take the TrackLogic argument.
I probably just need to play around with it more, I'm fairly new to MATLAB and programming in general. But regardless you have been very helpful! :)
Elad Kivelevitch
Elad Kivelevitch 2019-6-3
Myana,
I am glad you found my answer helpful. Indeed, the trackerTOMHT does not have a TrackLogic property, because it only uses score-based logic. That was the reason why I suggested to convert from history-based to score-based in trackerGNN first. However, if you have already overcome this problem then you have not missed anything. You're on the right track (pun only half intended).
Elad

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Multi-Object Trackers 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2018b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by