Curve fitting toolbox giving different answer to custom function?

3 次查看(过去 30 天)
Hello,
I have data which looks like this when plotted:
A custom equation summing a linear slope and a Gaussian gives me a really nice fit:
However, when I try to implement that as code, the fit fails pretty spectacularly.
% energy = 100-by-1 double
% counts = 100-by-1 double (both cropped from main data)
% if I use the toolbox to fit using 'energy' as the x-axis, it fails. However, if I use xdat it gives the result shown above.
xdat = linspace(1,length(counts), length(counts))';
% All this I copied from the 'Generate Code' option under 'File'. I thought I had a problem with StartPoint, but they're
[xData, yData] = prepareCurveData( xdat, counts );
% Set up fittype and options.
ft = fittype( '(m*x+c) + a1*exp(-((x-b1)/c1)^2)', 'independent', 'x', 'dependent', 'y' );
opts = fitoptions( 'Method', 'NonlinearLeastSquares' );
opts.Display = 'Off';
opts.StartPoint = [0.3302 0.2297 0.1139 0.3109 0.2284]; % these change, which I didn't expect when fitting the same data.
% Fit model to data.
[fitresult, gof] = fit( xData, yData, ft, opts );
plot(fitresult)
fitresult =
General model:
fitresult(x) = (m*x+c) + a1*exp(-((x-b1)/c1)^2)
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
a1 = 1042 (1024, 1059)
b1 = 59.75 (59.66, 59.85)
c = 311.4 (302.8, 319.9)
c1 = -7.268 (-7.415, -7.121)
m = -0.9449 (-1.094, -0.7957)
Any clue to where I am failing would be very much appreciated.

回答(2 个)

the cyclist
the cyclist 2019-9-25
编辑:the cyclist 2019-9-25
I don't fully understand what is going on here, but if I plot that function over the range 0:100 instead of 0:1, the shape of the curve is replicated:
x = 0 : 1 : 100;
a1 = 1042;
b1 = 59.75;
c = 311.4;
c1 = -7.268;
m = -0.9449;
fitresult = (m*x+c) + a1*exp(-((x-b1)/c1).^2);
figure
plot(x,fitresult)
That makes sense to me, since the exponential term clear has a peak where x == b1. I don't think the data you plotted in your first graph (which peaks around 1.05) is really what was fitted.
  1 个评论
AlexAS
AlexAS 2019-9-26
Thanks for this. I get the same result using your starting points, but it's still not clear to me where I'm going astray. However, I can at least move forward while I figure it out! Cheers, Alex

请先登录,再进行评论。


Alex Sha
Alex Sha 2019-9-28
Hi, AlexAS, I get the global solution as fellow:
Root of Mean Square Error (RMSE): 23.9947153172582
Sum of Squared Residual: 58150.3826787827
Correlation Coef. (R): 0.996437682897764
R-Square: 0.992888055898666
Adjusted R-Square: 0.992742914182312
Determination Coef. (DC): 0.992888055898665
Chi-Square: 98.7754060511867
F-Statistic: 3350.60470214536
Parameter Best Estimate
---------- -------------
a1 1038.49566359074
b1 1.0436517640913
c 387.185685520493
c1 0.036134594114558
m -122.65365053643
c208.jpg

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Fit Postprocessing 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by