Solving a system of nonlinear equations with unorganized unknowns?

2 次查看(过去 30 天)
Ideally when using fsolve, my entire solution vector will be unknown. However my unknowns are broken down into 2 vectors x and r such that some values of my x vector are always fixed as they are boundary conditions but the summation of the length of x which are unknown, and r gives me the total number of unknowns. Is there a way I can use fsolve to pick the indices I would like it to solve leaving the boundary conditions the way they are?.

回答(1 个)

Matt J
Matt J 2019-10-4
编辑:Matt J 2019-10-4
If you use lsqnonlin instead of fsolve, you can set a vector of upper and lower bounds ub and lb on the solution. Just set ub(i)=lb(i) for those x(i) elements you want constrained to something known, e.g.,
p0=[x0(:);r0(:)]; %Initial guess
N=numel(p0);
[lb,ub]=deal(-inf(N,1), +inf(N,1));
ub(1:3)=10; lb(1:3)=10; %constrain x(1:3) to equal 10
p=lsqnonlin(@yourFunction,p0,lb,ub)
  4 个评论
Devanjith Fonseka
Devanjith Fonseka 2019-10-4
Hello,
I implemented it and I get this error:
The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm does not handle bound constraints and the trust-region-reflective algorithm requires at
least as many equations as variables; aborting.
I expected this to occur considering that even though I constrain my vector to take a specific value for my known variables, I would be left with too many variables.
Is there any work around to this?
Matt J
Matt J 2019-10-5
编辑:Matt J 2019-10-6
If you have fewer equations than unknowns then it is not clear what you hope for as a result. There will normally be infinite solutions in that situation, and the problem will be ill-posed.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Systems of Nonlinear Equations 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by