Test value assignment fails

Question

David Chlemdorff 2019-10-28

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/487829-test-value-assignment-fails

回答： Gkn Cng 2022-2-20

采纳的回答： Steven Lord

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Hello,

I have a class that has some properties defined with

(SetAccess=private)

I want to create a unit test that verifies that assigning a value to these properties will throw an error.

something like:

function testCannotChangeProperties(tc)
    conf = ConfigurationFile();
    conf.filename = 'woo'; % I want to verify that this throws the error 'MATLAB:class:SetProhibited'. You cannot set the read-only property 'filename' of ConfigurationFile
end      

Do i really need to wrap that call inside a function to be able to test it?

function testCannotChangeProperties(tc)
    conf = ConfigurationFile();
    tc.verifyError(@()conf.setFileName('woo'), 'MATLAB:class:SetProhibited')
end      

This is not a solution I can use, because the:

conf.filename = 'woo';

Situation is still not tested.

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Steven Lord 2019-10-28

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/487829-test-value-assignment-fails#answer_398525

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

I have a class that has some properties defined with

(SetAccess=private)

I want to create a unit test that verifies that assigning a value to these properties will throw an error.

Why? The MATLAB object system is not part of your system under test. Trust that MathWorks has done the testing that assigning a value to a class property when not in a context that is allowed to access the property errors.

If you absolutely must do this for whatever reason then yes, you will need to write a function. I recommend a class-related function after the end of the class that either accepts an input from the test method or one that creates a new instance of the class and tries to set that property.

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

David Chlemdorff 2019-10-28

Okay, thank you for your reply!

The test was an insurance, that if someone else came and thought "Why the fudge is this a private property?" and then moved it to public then the test would catch that.

I think I will just have to trust that no one does that, because i don't want a ton of getters and setters.

Steven Lord 2019-10-28

Answering the question "Why the fudge is this a private property?" seems to me to be the job of help text before the properties block, not a test. What would prevent that hypothetical "someone else" from modifying both the code and the test?

If you really wanted to guard against that person modifying the code to move a property from private access to public access there are ways to do that using the meta class functionality, but again that doesn't actually prevent that person from modifying both code and test it just makes it more difficult for them to modify that functionality by forcing them to change both code and test.

Storing the code in a source control system (making it easier to undo undesirable changes) and requiring a code review before checking in the code to the source control system can make it even more difficult for an accidental or malicious change to be added to the code.

请先登录，再进行评论。