Error using horzcat dimensions are not consistent
显示 更早的评论
Hi the file is attached. Kindly check this and guid me for removing the error.
采纳的回答
Why are x and t symbolic? This just slows down everything for no gain. I'm not even sure that your code would work (but I don't have the symbolic toolbox so can't check).
Why can't you find the problem yourself? Break down the expression that give you the error until you locate the problem. This is exactly what we'd have to do.
Saying that, the problem looks obvious to me:
A=[a.*F b.*G c.*H 0; ...
a*F, b*G and c*H are 41x41 matrices. You then try to stick a 1x1 zero next to it. As the error tells you, that's not possible, everything you concatenate horizontally must have the same number of rows.
A = [a*F, b*G, c*H, zeros(size(x, 1), 1); ...
may work. It stick a 41x1 column vector of 0s to the end. Or you may have meant zeros(size(x)) which sticks a 41x41 matrix of 0s to the end.
You will of course have to do the same for the rest of the expressions, with zeros and ones.
8 个评论
Thanks. the error is removed but now a new error generated that 'Error in plot33 (line 19)
surf(U)' now kindly brief me how to handle it?
Please give the full text of the error.
i have attached the file.
moreover the ful statement of error is
''Error using surf (line 57)
Z must be a matrix, not a scalar or vector.
Error in plot33 (line 21)
surf(x,t,U)''
You need to review your U calculation. I've no idea what it's supposed to be, but it is clearly wrong. Your U is a ratio of determinants, so obviously it's scalar. You certainly can't plot a surface when you only have one value.
In addition, all the determinants are 0, so you're performing a 0/0 division which is undefined. Hence U is Nan + 1i*NaN.
why matlab is giving determinant 0, while in actual calculation they are nonzero.
is there any mistake in writing the matrices.
U is basically three soliton solution.
"why matlab is giving determinant 0, while in actual calculation they are nonzero. is there any mistake in writing the matrices."
There might be an error in the way you wrote the matrix. I wouldn't know since I've no idea what they represent and anyway I don't have the time to analyse your matrices. You can check the determinant yourself with det(A), etc.
"U is basically three soliton solution."
Sorry, I don't understand this sentence. In any case, as I said, currently your U is the sum of two ratios of determinants, so it will always be scalar even if the determinants are not 0. It sounds like there's definitively a mistake in your U expression.
更多回答(0 个)
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Logical 的更多信息
标签
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!选择网站
选择网站以获取翻译的可用内容,以及查看当地活动和优惠。根据您的位置,我们建议您选择:。
您也可以从以下列表中选择网站:
如何获得最佳网站性能
选择中国网站(中文或英文)以获得最佳网站性能。其他 MathWorks 国家/地区网站并未针对您所在位置的访问进行优化。
美洲
- América Latina (Español)
- Canada (English)
- United States (English)
欧洲
- Belgium (English)
- Denmark (English)
- Deutschland (Deutsch)
- España (Español)
- Finland (English)
- France (Français)
- Ireland (English)
- Italia (Italiano)
- Luxembourg (English)
- Netherlands (English)
- Norway (English)
- Österreich (Deutsch)
- Portugal (English)
- Sweden (English)
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom (English)
