The precision of plot filter design function is different than plot just coefficients of the same function of filter
4 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I'm confused about plotting the design filter with the same precision ,for example i have this coefficients (i found it by using fir1(68,[.35,.65])):
bb= [0.0005
0
0.0010
0.0000
-0.0024
-0.0000
0.0020
-0.0000
0.0015
-0.0000
-0.0066
0.0000
0.0078
-0.0000
-0.0000
-0.0000
-0.0142
-0.0000
0.0220
-0.0000
-0.0093
0
-0.0232
-0.0000
0.0519
-0.0000
-0.0411
0.0000
-0.0305
-0.0000
0.1464
0.0000
-0.2551
0.0000
0.2995
0.0000
-0.2551
0.0000
0.1464
-0.0000
-0.0305
0.0000
-0.0411
-0.0000
0.0519
-0.0000
-0.0232
0
-0.0093
-0.0000
0.0220
-0.0000
-0.0142
-0.0000
-0.0000
-0.0000
0.0078
0.0000
-0.0066
-0.0000
0.0015
-0.0000
0.0020
-0.0000
-0.0024
0.0000
0.0010
0
0.0005];
%% plot
freqz(bb,1,512)
the design Fig01

if i use the same last funtion fir1 with same specification
b=fir1(68,[.35,.65])';
freqz(b,1,512)
the design in Fig02

Why the Fig1 don't like the Fig2 in stop band ,why don't find the same precision ?
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Star Strider
2020-1-27
To reproduce the posted results, plot them as:
b = fir1(68,[.35,.65]);
bb = round(b, 4);
figure
freqz(bb,1,512);
figure
freqz(b',1,512)
In plotting ‘bb’, note that the coefficients have significantly reduced precision. Rounding (or truncating) the coefficients significantly affects the plotted filter frequency response.
2 个评论
Star Strider
2020-1-27
As always, my pleasure!
Yes.
That should work.
I created my own version a few years ago:
roundn = @(x,n) round(x .* 10.^n)./10.^n; % Round ‘x’ To ‘n’ Digits, Emulates Latest ‘round’ Function
I do not now remember when the new round was introduced, although I believe it was R2016b, since many similar upgrades occurred them.
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!