Eigenvector without calling eigenvalues

4 次查看（过去 30 天）
AVM
AVM 2020-2-1
评论： Walter Roberson 2020-2-1
I would like to call a eigenvector of a matirx without calling its eigenvalues inside a function. Here I attach my code. Pl somebody help me.
function [out]=integration(hami1)
[V,L]=eig(hami1); %% Some error is here showing that L is unused in my code.
u=V(:,1)/sqrt(sum(V(:,1)));
w=diff(u,phi);
f=dot(u,w);
out=1/pi*1i*int(f,phi,0,2*pi);
end

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2020-2-1
Given your question as asked, you will need to write your own code to somehow determine eigenvectors without calculating the corresponding eigenvalues.
However what you are seeing is a warning not an error, and most people would deal with it by coding
[V,~]=eig(hami1);
which tells MATLAB to tell eig that two outputs are requested (so that it knows to return eigenvectors in the first output), but that the second output will be ignored by the code.
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
AVM
AVM 2020-2-1
The Integration by using 'fucntion ' is faster than sciprt? Pl help me
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2020-2-1
integral() cannot call scripts so the relative speeds of scripts and functions is not relevant to the situation.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（1 个）

Vladimir Sovkov
Vladimir Sovkov 2020-2-1
  1. This is not an error but a warning that you do not use the eigenvalues, which influences nothing. If you want to avoid it, substitute the symbol "~" in place of "L".
  2. It looks that you use "phi" before defining it. This must be an error.
  3. Are you sure that your way of the eigenvector normalization is what you wanted? It looks quite unusual... The function "eig" is expected to produce the eigenvectors with unit algebraic norm already, at least for real symmetric matrices.
  7 个评论
显示 5更早的评论
AVM
AVM 2020-2-1
..." most probbably you would just divide by 1" . I didn't get your point. Pl help me to understand. But how I would be sure about the normalisation factor is unity?
Vladimir Sovkov
Vladimir Sovkov 2020-2-1
This is problem-dependent. Sometimes it is correct, sometimes not. You can just calculate the norm of your case and see if it equals 1 or not. Maybe, you are right and this re-normalization is really needed. Anyway, it would not spoil the results, and maybe safer to keep it in the program.

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Particle & Nuclear Physics 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by