Linear constrains meet problem when using parallel GA optimization

I was using following code to do a parallel GA optimization, and it works fine without setting A and b, which is the linear constrains. But when I add A and B, the variable chorm will be 0xn (n is the number of design variables). It's quite wired and I don't know why. Could any one help me with it? Many thanks!
spmd
cd(sprintf('%d', labindex));
end
options = gaoptimset('Generations', control_param.generation_number,... %
'PopulationSize', control_param.population_size,... %
'UseParallel', true,... %
'Vectorized', 'on'); %
[bestchrom,~,~,~,~,~] = ga(@FitnessFcn, nVars, A,b,[],[],Lb,Ub,[],IntCon, options);
function FitVal = FitnessFcn(chrom)
parfor i = 1:size(chrom,1)
FitVal(i,1) = fitness_parallel_f2(chrom(i,:)); %
end
end

3 个评论

While we do not have your problem formulation, it is probable that no solution exists that satisfies the constraints.
Well, the problem now is that the variable 'chrom' is totally empty, but when I do this in a non-parallel version, it's fine. So I think I need to change something when I want to set up this to a parallel version. But I don't know what to do. Maybe I need to change the formulation of A and b.
It seems the problem caused by using 'Vectorized', 'on' and linear constrains at same time. But I need to do a parallel optimization, without 'Vectorized', 'on' parameter, I don't know how to achieve the parallel computation.

请先登录,再进行评论。

回答(0 个)

类别

帮助中心File Exchange 中查找有关 Surrogate Optimization 的更多信息

提问:

2020-6-12

评论:

2020-6-13

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by