Use of penalty multiplier C (boxconstraint) in svmtrain
2 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
I looked up the code of svmtrain. If the algorithm is QP, it uses
[alpha, ~, exitflag, output] = quadprog(H,-ones(nPoints,1),[],[],...
groupIndex',0,zeros(nPoints,1), Inf *ones(nPoints,1),...
X0, qp_opts)
So this means that there is no upper bound on alphas.
It takes into account the boxconstraint in this fashion:
kx = feval(kfun,training,training,kfunargs{:});
% ensure function is symmetric
kx = (kx+kx')/2 + diag(1./boxconstraint);
H =((groupIndex * groupIndex').*kx);
I am unable to understand how does this enforce the box constraints:
0 < alphai < C
Thanks
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Ilya
2012-12-3
The magnitude of the margin slack vector can be shrunk using a 1-norm or 2-norm penalty. The 1-norm version seems more popular, and it gives rise to the dual formulation in which the alphas are capped by C. The QP solution in the svmtrain function however uses the 2-norm penalty. In this case, the dual problem has no upper bound on alpha and a 1/C term is added to the diagonal of the Hessian. I would agree that referring to C as "box constraint" in this case is somewhat confusing.
更多回答(1 个)
Ilya
2012-12-3
Off hand I cannot think of a reason why you couldn't use quadprog to solve the 1-norm problem. I don't know why the 2-norm solution was chosen for svmtrain. The svmtrain implementation is relatvely old. The fast 'interior-point-convex' algorithm for quadprog was introduced in 11a, years after svmtrain was coded. Whatever reasons motivated this choice for svmtrain may not hold anymore.
0 个评论
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!