Represent Simulink Integrator block as Matlab Function

Hi.
I need to implement the following behavior :
The Integrator and my_Integrator blocks have to be equivalent I/O.
How should I write the Matlab Function ?
Thanks for any reply.

 采纳的回答

As this looks like a homework problem, I can't answer directly. However I will point you in the direction of persistent variables.

更多回答(4 个)

I don't know why do you need this, maybe if you explain exactly what you need, there is better way

9 个评论

The model diagram should be as light as possible, as shown in the first attached picture: one input and one output, no additional simulink blocks.
Sure we can. Ryan's idea works.
Would it be easier to use a S-function instead of a MATLAB Function ?
It works with Ryan's hint, but you still need a clock as an input.
The solution it's already posted above. But since you and Guy disapprove this, I am waiting for the better solution.
And even if I did, I guess it could have been fetched using the get_param command (never tried this though)
Ok, I see, If T is constant, you must then set, in model configuration parameters your fixed step time to T, and also your step block sample time to T. In this case you don't need a clock.
function y = fcn(u)
persistent uold yold
T=0.01;
if isempty(uold)
uold=0;yold=0;
end
y = u*T+yold-(u-uold)*T/2
yold=y;uold=u;
Changing the sample time of the Step block to 0.01 removed the previous offset. Thanks

请先登录,再进行评论。

This is not a good idea. The MATLAB function is not designed for this purpose.

1 个评论

Excuse me, so, What would be a good idea to implement numerical integration methods in blocks in Simulink?

请先登录,再进行评论。

River Rock
River Rock 2012-12-5
编辑:River Rock 2012-12-6
My main goal is to implement the differential equations of a physical system using a single Matlab Function. As the sums and gains were easy to represent, I couldn't find any alternative for the integration.

4 个评论

Why do you need to use MATLAB over SL blocks? Look into the persistent variables, it will get the job done, although as Guy mentioned, it's not the best way to do it.
Your idea would be to declare a persistent variable for the numeric integration ?
Y(s) = U(s) / s => y(z) = yOld + u(z)
so you declare persistent x = y to stand for yOld ?
Can I avoid this low-level arithmetic and call a predefined method instead (ode45 for example) ?
What you have written is close it would be more like:
y(z) = yOld+u(z)/SampleTime
You cannot use the ODE solver in the MATLAB function block.
Any idea on how to get rid of this offset ?
Code looks like:
function y = fcn(u)
%#codegen
T=0.01;
persistent yOld;
persistent uOld;
if (isempty(yOld))
yOld = 0;
end
if (isempty(uOld))
uOld = 0;
end
y = yOld + (T/2)* (u + uOld);
%y=yOld + u*T;
yOld = y;
uOld = u;

请先登录,再进行评论。

Can anybody suggest a better way of implementing the numerical integration ? The code has to be written inside the Matlab Function Block though.

类别

帮助中心File Exchange 中查找有关 Programming 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by