How to reduce the execution time for Input/Output ports in Simulink?

Question

Antonio Carlo Bertolino 2020-7-8

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/561647-how-to-reduce-the-execution-time-for-input-output-ports-in-simulink

回答： Fangjun Jiang 2020-7-10

Hello,

I just installed the R2020a version of MATLAB&Simulink and I profiled my Simulink model.

From the profiler report it appeared that, among other sources, a not negligible amount of time is taken by the Input and Output ports of various subsystems.

What is it due to? Is it possible to reduce this time in order to speed up the simulation?

Thank you,

Antonio

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Fangjun Jiang 2020-7-8

Are they atomic subsystems?

Antonio Carlo Bertolino 2020-7-10

They are the ports of a "If Action Subsystem". This subsystem does not have the option "Treat as an atomic unit" checked in the Block parameters panel.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Fangjun Jiang 2020-7-10

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/561647-how-to-reduce-the-execution-time-for-input-output-ports-in-simulink#answer_464096

An atomic subsystem will have to update its Inport and Outport at every simulation step while virtual subsystems don't need to do that. If the time took to do those Inport and Outport update has become significant, re-examine and consider changeing atomic subsystems to be virtual. Many times, I found users don't necessarily understand the difference and subsystems were made atomic by accident.

Action Subsystems are atomic subsystems by definition. You can still consider using alternatives such as conditional brahching using Switch block.

The boundary of virtual subsystem don't exist when simulating or for code generation, while the boundary of atomic subsystems are required to update at every simulation step. If subsystems are made atomic unnecessarily or by mistake, the simulation speed might suffer slightly and the result might differ.