Creating random integer row array each element different upper limit and sum of elements add up to a number
显示 更早的评论
I am looking for a intutuve code to generate 1x6 array where each element is random integer (with in specific upper limit) and sums to a given number.
For example a random array where element lower limit [ 0 0 0 0 0 0] and upper limit [ 9 12 25 6 14 7]. The sum of the random integer number adds up to 24, e.g.
[4 3 8 1 3 4 1]
采纳的回答
See this excellent FEX package by John: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/49795-randfixedlinearcombination. However, It generates fractional numbers. Following code proposes one modification. I don't know how it will change the probability distribution.
lb = [0 0 0 0 0 0];
ub = [9 12 25 6 14 7];
n = numel(lb);
s = 24;
x = round(randFixedLinearCombination(1, s, [1 1 1 1 1 1], lb, ub));
k = sum(x) - s;
if k > 0
idx = find(x >= (lb+1));
idx = idx(randperm(numel(idx), k));
x(idx) = x(idx) - 1;
else
idx = find(x <= (ub-1));
idx = idx(randperm(numel(idx), -k));
x(idx) = x(idx) + 1;
end
8 个评论
The logic is very intutive, however the there is no inbuild function named "randFixedLinearCombination()" in Matlab 2020. The randFixedLinearCombination() is user contributed is available in Matlab central and must be placed in the matlab path.
I though a segmented iterative approach shared here
I believe it must have a minus in the second if-branch
idx = randperm(n, -k)
You download randFixedLinearCombination from the File Exchange. It is part of MATLAB, in the sense that you need do nothing more than download it. NO cost. Ameer gave you the link.
John: Thanks for the comment.
Bruno: Thanks for pointing out. You are correct. It should be -k.
Biswanath: As John mentioned, download this package from the link and place it in MATLAB's path: https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_env/add-remove-or-reorder-folders-on-the-search-path.html
The rounding method is still flawed. The results might get out of bound once they are added by +/-1. You have to select the subset more careful than randperm.
Yes, thanks for pointing out the issue. I have updated the code. I am not sure if there still are some cases where it will fail to meet the constraint.
I think you can do better if you replace the first filtering with <= >= tests rather than strict inequality.
It still not perfect though.
Yes, I guess this will fail when the bounds are very tight in accordance with the sum constraints. The point about inequality is also valid. For the given bounds, the method does not seem to fail.
更多回答(0 个)
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Descriptive Statistics 的更多信息
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!选择网站
选择网站以获取翻译的可用内容,以及查看当地活动和优惠。根据您的位置,我们建议您选择:。
您也可以从以下列表中选择网站:
如何获得最佳网站性能
选择中国网站(中文或英文)以获得最佳网站性能。其他 MathWorks 国家/地区网站并未针对您所在位置的访问进行优化。
美洲
- América Latina (Español)
- Canada (English)
- United States (English)
欧洲
- Belgium (English)
- Denmark (English)
- Deutschland (Deutsch)
- España (Español)
- Finland (English)
- France (Français)
- Ireland (English)
- Italia (Italiano)
- Luxembourg (English)
- Netherlands (English)
- Norway (English)
- Österreich (Deutsch)
- Portugal (English)
- Sweden (English)
- Switzerland
- United Kingdom (English)
