For loop versus Matrix notation

Question

0 个投票

Can this be simplified to use a matrix expression instead of a for loop?:

X=[1 5.4; 1 6.3; 2 4.8; 3 7.1];
dates=X(:,1);
amounts=X(:,2);
uniquedates=unique(dates);
totals=zeros(size(uniquedates));
for d = 1:size(uniquedates,1)
    totals(d,1)=sum(amounts(dates==uniquedates(d,1)));
end
Y = [uniquedates totals];

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Matt Kindig 2013-1-29

Probably, but likely not in an easy-to-understand way. The fact that totals differs in size from dates complicates things.

Is there a reason you don't want to just use the for-loop?

mutt 2013-1-30

I want to find out if there is a matrix approach which can outperform the for loop when the inputs are non-trivial

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Follow Question

Answer 1

Oleg Komarov 2013-1-30

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

0 个投票

You can use accumarray():

Y = [uniquedates accumarray(X(:,1),X(:,2))];

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

Oleg Komarov 2013-1-30

Map the dates to a set X in the positive N, i.e. use unique on the dates and then X(:,1) is the ia index from the call to unique.

mutt 2013-1-31

This approach has delivered a 99% time saving versus the for loop.

请先登录，再进行评论。

For loop versus Matrix notation

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

采纳的回答

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

更多回答（0 个）

类别

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

For loop versus Matrix notation

2 个评论 显示 无 隐藏 无

采纳的回答

3 个评论 显示 1更早的评论 隐藏 1更早的评论

更多回答（0 个）

类别

标签

另请参阅

Community Treasure Hunt

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论