Concatenate large matrices a bottleneck in function

2 次查看（过去 30 天）
David McVea
David McVea 2020-11-4
评论： Walter Roberson 2020-11-4
Hi,
I have a function that concatenates two matrices, size of 100000 X 90 for an outcome of 100000 X 180.
This is a significant bottleneck as the function has to repeat many times.
Pre-allocating the outcome does not seem to make any difference, and using cat() or [] also seems to make no difference.
Does anyone have suggestions on how to speed this up?
Thank you.
  2 个评论
Sylvain
Sylvain 2020-11-4
can you post your code?
are you trying to do this ?
A=ones(100000,90);
B=2*ones(100000,90);
C = [A,B];
David McVea
David McVea 2020-11-4
Hello -
Thanks for your comment.
I won't post my code because, yes, that is exactly what I am doing.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（1 个）

Subhadeep Koley
Subhadeep Koley 2020-11-4
The horzcat() function is usually faster than cat() or [, ]. You may use it.
A = ones(100000,90);
B = 2*ones(100000,90);
result = horzcat(A, B);
  1 个评论
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2020-11-4
The timing tests I tried show horzcat(A,B) and [A,B] and cat(2,A,B) to be indistinguishable in timing -- the differences were below random variation

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Creating and Concatenating Matrices 的更多信息

标签

产品


版本

R2018b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by