How we can use vectors in Deep Learning custom training loop?

Question

MAHSA YOUSEFI 2020-11-7

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/639485-how-we-can-use-vectors-in-deep-learning-custom-training-loop

评论： MAHSA YOUSEFI 2020-11-12

Hi every one.

I am trying to train a CNN with my own optimizer through costum training loop.

[loss,gradient]= dlfeval(@modelgradient,dlnet, Xtrian,YTrain)

myFun = @(dlnet,gradient,loss)myOptimizer(dlnet,gradient,loss,...)

dlnet = dlupdate(myFun,dlnet,gradient,loss)

My optimizer needs w (current parameter vector), g (its corresponding gradient vector), f (its corresponding loss value) and… as inputs. This optimizer needs many computations with w, g, f inside to give w = w + p, p is a optimal vector that my optimizer has to compute it by which I can update my w.

I need something by which I can convert the parameters and gradient of dl format to vectors for those computations inside of my optimizer, then to use above syntax I need to convert vector to dl formats required in loop and in my optimizer as well. This back and forth is necessary for my job for using training loop. Can you help to find functions in the toolbox to do these jobs (vector to table (because gradient and dlnet’s parameters are tables with dlarray cells) and vice versa), or any other solutions?

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Amanpreetsingh Arora 2020-11-12

1
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/639485-how-we-can-use-vectors-in-deep-learning-custom-training-loop#answer_541953

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Weight parameters of the dlnetwork object can be accessed from the "Learnables" property of the object. Both the "gradient" and this "Learnables" property will return a table with variables "Layer", "Parameter" and "Value". You can access the weight parameter and its corresponding gradient by indexing into the table in a loop as follows.

for i=1:size(dlnet.Learnables,1)
    w=dlnet.Learnables{i,"Value"}{1,1};
    layerName = dlnet.Learnables{i,"Layer"};
    paramName = dlnet.Learnables{i,"Parameter"};
    g=gradient{gradient.Layer==layerName & gradient.Parameter==paramName,"Value"}{1,1}
end

For more information on indexing into table, refer to the following documentation.

https://in.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/access-data-in-a-table.html

"w" and "g" will be dlarray objects in the above code snippet. Converting this to double array might be unnecessary as many operations/functions that support double array also support dlarray objects. Refer to the following documentation for a list of functions that support dlarray.

https://in.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ug/list-of-functions-with-dlarray-support.html

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

MAHSA YOUSEFI 2020-11-12

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Thanks for your response. Your code shows the recorded values (of course only last layer.) I did not get what is the need of layer’s names here as well. By the way, lets I explain better my meaning...

My optimization algorithm accepts VECTOR of parameter (w) and Vector of gradient (g). My optimizer has to take w, g to compute Vector (p) so that update new parameter in this way: w = w+p. Now for coding of this algorithm with “costum training loop”, I know my the values of vectors w and g are recorded in dlnet.Learnables.Value and gradients.Value but in table. I wrote following function to extract values from tables:

Val= dlnet.Learnables.Value; 
% or 
Val = gradients.Value; 
function vec = set2vec(Val) 
numWb = length(Val); 
vec   = []; 
for i = 1:2:numWb 
    weights = double(gather(extractdata(Val{i  ,1}))); 
    bias    = double(gather(extractdata(Val{i+1,1}))); 
    vec     = [ vec; weights(:); bias(:) ]; 
end 
end 

To get how I could work with "training loop" and "custom optimizer" I followed this example of:

https://nl.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ref/dlupdate.htm

As the example shows, sgdFunction computes

param = param + lr.*gradient

and is called through dlupdate. Here, gradient is a table. My optimizer algorithm, as I mentioned, is computing w = w + p. So, for coding it I have to write

dlnet = dlnet + table_p

at the end line of my own cosum function, say MYFunction, and then call dlupdate. My question is this how can I convert vector “p” to a table format. Or as generally question,

How can I convert the (unroll) vector “g” to table gradients?

How can I convert the (unroll) vector “w” to dlnet object? (which is more general than)

The nature of my optimizer is somehow that I need this convert from vector to tables or dl object to compute new loss, new gradients and new dlnet. I would be appreciete for your kind help.

Amanpreetsingh Arora 2020-11-12

编辑：Amanpreetsingh Arora 2020-11-12

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

"dlupdate" will call "myOptimizer" with weights and gradient of each layer individually. So, the inputs to "myOptimizer" (and even "sgdFunction" in the example) are of type dlarray and "myOptimizer" will be called several times in one iteration with each layer's parameters. Inside "myOptimizer", you won't need table indexing if it is called using "dlupdate". Refer to the following documentation for more information on "dlupdate".

https://in.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ref/dlupdate.html

The recommended approach for working with dlarray, as mentioned in the answer, is to perform direct operation on it and not convert to double array. However, if you convert dlarray to double array using "extractdata", you can convert the results of the computation back to dlarray by passing it to "dlarray" function.

For example, to convert a double array X

dlX=dlarray(X);

Refer to the following documentation to know more about "dlarray".

https://in.mathworks.com/help/deeplearning/ref/dlarray.html

MAHSA YOUSEFI 2020-11-12

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Having only dlarray is not all my require. I need (gradient and parameter) matrices per each layer. I have a vector such as g or w or p that I want to convert them to matrices for each layer.

For instance in conv1, I have 20 filters with 5*5 sizes and so on up to Fc layers. I have an unrolled vector of these matrices for all layers. Now I want to comeback from this vector to these matrices per each layer. For sure to use dlnet I have to have these matrices per each layer. Why I convert gradient (table) to vector and I want to come bach one more time is in bellow:

This code is something like that exist in "dlupdate" page.

for epoch = 1:numEpochs
    % Shuffle data... 
    for i = 1:maxit
        iteration = iteration + 1;
        % Read mini-batch
        idx = (i-1)*miniBatchSize+1:i*miniBatchSize;
        X = XTrain(:,:,:,idx);
        Y = zeros(numClasses, miniBatchSize, 'single');
        for c = 1:numClasses
            Y(c,YTrain(idx)==classes(c)) = 1;
        end
        dlX = dlarray(single(X),'SSCB');
        if (executionEnvironment == "auto" && canUseGPU) || executionEnvironment == "gpu"
            dlX = gpuArray(dlX);
        end
        [gradients,loss] = dlfeval(@modelGradients,dlnet,dlX,Y);
        updateFcn        = @(dlnet,gradients) MyFunction(dlnet,gradients,learnRate);
        dlnet            = dlupdate(updateFcn,dlnet,gradients);
        ...
    end
end
%***********************************************************
function [gradients,loss] = modelGradients(dlnet,dlX,Y)
dlYPred = forward(dlnet,dlX);
loss = crossentropy(dlYPred,Y);
gradients = dlgradient(loss,dlnet.Learnables);
end
function dlnet = MyFunction(???????)
        ?????????
end

I do not have any idea to MyFunction because ss you see in my optimizer, in step (1), I need gradient and its norm. For varifying condition in step (3), I should know about the loss and gradient vector at "candidate" parameter w_cand through step (2) ((it is NOT "update" parameter)). This is the framework of my optimizer in vector setting.

function w_update = Optimizer(w, f, g, alpha,c)
% w: vector of parameters
% g: vector of gradients at w
% f: loss at w
% w_cand: vector of candidate parameters
% g_cand: vector of gradients at w_cand
% f_cand: loss at w_cand
%(1)
norm_g = norm(g);
p      = Func_to_compute_p(g,norm_g);
w_cand = w + alpha*p;
%(2)
%(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
% compute loss f_cand and gradient g_cand evaluated at w_cand
%)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
%(3)
while alpha > tol
    if f_cand > f + c*alpha*(g_cand'*p)
        p = alpha*p;
        w_update = w + p;
        break
    else
        alpha = alpha/2;
    end
end
w_update = w + p;

I know "dlnet" initialized with Xavier method. Lets say "w" is an unrolled vector of parameter matrices at each layer. loss and gradients in

[gradients,loss] = dlfeval(@modelGradients,dlnet,dlX,Y);

are corresponding with "dlnet". So, to work with my optimizer I can convert loss and gradients to have f and g corresponding with w through function "set2vector". In this way I cannot take warning about operation support. But for step(2), I need "dlnet_cand" and thus "gradients_cand" and "loss_cand". I think I have to write this code at step(2):

[gradients_cand,loss_cand] = dlfeval(@modelGradients,dlnet_cand,dlX,Y);

By this thought, now, I have a vector p by which I can not update dlnet_cand = dlnet + p because p is a vector. To follow as sgdFunction(( where dlnet = dlnet - gradients.*lr)) I need to convert vector p to matrices per each layer (having a table).

For step 3 one more time I have to convert loss_cand and gradients_cand to f_cand and vector g_cand.

请先登录，再进行评论。

How we can use vectors in Deep Learning custom training loop?

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

回答（1 个）

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

另请参阅

类别

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

How we can use vectors in Deep Learning custom training loop?

0 个评论 显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

回答（1 个）

3 个评论 显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

另请参阅

类别

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论