Use interp2 for many simultanious 1D operations?

Question

Gustaf Lindberg 2013-2-21

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/64379-use-interp2-for-many-simultanious-1d-operations

I have a loop where I do many extrapolations using interp1 with the flags 'linear' and 'extrap' so I guess it's technically an extrapolation. Now I want to use the same code but do many pairs of extrapolations at the same time. I have two matrices, X and Y where each row is a matching set to be extrapolated for a value xi = 0 but I can't wrap my head around how to make it work. I've been told that it is possible.

Basically, what I want to do is a faster version of this:

for i = 1:n
yi = interp1(X(i,:),Y(i,:),0,'linear','extrap')
end

But without the loop using interp2. each row n in the matrices X and Y are a matching set to be evaluated independently.

4 个评论
显示 2更早的评论隐藏 2更早的评论

José-Luis 2013-2-21

编辑：José-Luis 2013-2-21

I don't think interp2() is suited for what you want. If stability is more important than speed then I would stick to interp1() and a loop. If I really want to speed up things and I know nothing about the data, then I would write my own routine, preferably as a mex file.

You could also use parfor() when evaluating in a loop to speed things along.

Gustaf Lindberg 2013-2-21

I was more or less told to use interp2 by my supervisor so I don't have that much of a choice right now but your suggestions are appreciated.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Matt J 2013-2-21

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/64379-use-interp2-for-many-simultanious-1d-operations#answer_75983

编辑：Matt J 2013-2-21

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

    [M,N]=size(X);
    yi=zeros(M,1);
    map=X>=0;
    [maxval,idx]=max(map,[],2);
    a =  idx==1 & maxval==1;  %All X(i,:) are non-negative, extrapolate left
    b =  idx==N | maxval==0;  %All X(i,:) are nonpositive,  extrapolate right
    c=   ~(a|b);              %Interpolation needed
    %Extrapolate left
    e1=X(a,1);
    c1=Y(a,1);
    e2=X(a,2);
    c2=Y(a,2);
    slopes=(c2-c1)./(e2-e1);
    yi(a) = c1-slopes.*e1;
    %Extrapolate right
    e1=X(b,end-1);
    c1=Y(b,end-1);
    e2=X(b,end);
    c2=Y(b,end);
    slopes=(c2-c1)./(e2-e1);
    yi(b) = c1-slopes.*e1;
    %Interpolate (linearly)
    j = sub2ind([M,N],find(c),idx(c));
    e1=X(j-M);
    c1=Y(j-M);
    e2=X(j);
    c2=Y(j);
    slopes=(c2-c1)./(e2-e1);
    yi(c) = c1+slopes.*abs(e1);

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Matt J 2013-2-21

编辑：Matt J 2013-2-21

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Had to make a few fixes, but it should work now. Here's some sample input/output data from my tests

    X =
        1.0000    2.0000    3.0000    4.0000    5.0000
      -10.0000   -9.0000   -8.0000   -7.0000   -6.0000
       -2.2500   -1.2500   -0.2500    0.7500    1.7500
    Y =
         3     4     5     6     7
        -5    -4    -3    -2    -1
        -2    -1     0     1     2
    yi =
        2.0000
        5.0000
        0.2500

Matt J 2013-2-21

编辑：Matt J 2013-2-21

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Some more tests, this time a speed comparison with for-looped interp1. My version shows a factor of 300 speed-up, but of course I don't know what data sizes you're actually working with.

%Fake data
  n=3e4;
  Y=rand(n,300);
  X=bsxfun(@plus, sort(Y,2), 2*rand(n,1)+1 );
    tic;
      % My code
    toc

Elapsed time is 0.017832 seconds.

    yi2=yi;
    tic;
      for i = 1:n
       yi2(i) = interp1(X(i,:),Y(i,:),0,'linear','extrap');
     end
    toc;

Elapsed time is 5.419498 seconds.

请先登录，再进行评论。

Answer 2

Teja Muppirala 2013-2-21

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/64379-use-interp2-for-many-simultanious-1d-operations#answer_75989

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

As others have also pointed out, this is REALLY not what INTERP2 is meant to do. In fact if anything, since there are 3 variables: X, Y, and i, you'd have to use INTERP3. But I think that would be rather inefficient.

Why do you think the FOR loop is a problem? How do you think doing something else will make it any more "stable"?

I can think of ways that might make it faster, but not really any more stable:

[n,m] = size(X)
[XS,Xi] = sort(X,2);
YS = Y(bsxfun(@plus,(Xi(:,1:2)-1)*n,(1:n)'));
y = YS(:,1) + diff(YS,1,2)./diff(XS(:,1:2),1,2).*(-XS(:,1));

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Gustaf Lindberg 2013-2-21

Removing the FOR loop is not meant to make it stable, it's meant to keep the same level of stability but increase speed. I've understood that this is not the proper way to use interp2 but I was told by my supervisor/examiner that it's what I should do.

José-Luis 2013-2-21

编辑：José-Luis 2013-2-21

With interp2() you are interpolating to a plane, not a line.

I guess you could assign increasing y values for each row, call them y =[ 1:number of rows] and then interpolate for x and y, where x = zeros(nRows,1), using interp2(). That could work.

Having said that, it is a very roundabout way of going about it and probably very inefficient. It takes more calculations to interpolate to a plane than to a line.

请先登录，再进行评论。