Hello everyone, I have a question in optimization

2 次查看(过去 30 天)
Please find the attached question
  3 个评论
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2020-11-16
编辑:Bruno Luong 2020-11-16
In this pdf: r_m c_m cannot be vectors since they are the bounds of the norms, which must be scalars.
Ahmed Galal
Ahmed Galal 2020-11-17
Sorry, they are not identical only the constraints are identical. The objective function is L1, L2, and Linf, not only L1. I did a mistake

请先登录,再进行评论。

采纳的回答

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2020-11-16
编辑:Bruno Luong 2020-11-17
The constraint (1c)
norm(R11*w+r00, Inf) >= rm
can be transformed as a union of 42 halfplanes
R11(i,:)*w+r00(i,:) >= rm
or
R11(i,:)*w+r00(i,:) <= -rm
for i=1,2,...21.
I would then suggest to solve 42 sub linear-programing problems by replacing the (1c) with one of those conditions. The sub problem can be solved with intlinprog, then we just take the argmin of those 42 problem solutions.
It must be more preditable and robust than GA.
  12 个评论
Matt J
Matt J 2020-11-23
编辑:Matt J 2020-11-23
so no the gradient does not use parethesis like your.
OK, but they should do it that way, no? They missed the opportunity to take advantage of the special form of the problem.
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2020-11-23
Does it really matter for accuracy? At the cost of 2 matrix-vector product per gradient evaluation instead of one?

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(0 个)

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Linear Least Squares 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by