Static optimization using fmincon and quadprog
4 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
Can anyone tell me which one os the optimization methods is faster between "fmincon" and "quadprog"? And why is it faster or slower?
Thanks in advance,
Raj Patel
0 个评论
采纳的回答
Ameer Hamza
2020-11-17
编辑:Ameer Hamza
2020-11-17
quadprog() is used for a very specific type of optimization problem and, therefore, can be optimized way more than fmincon(). However, note that there is no direct comparison since fmincon() can solve problems which quadprog() cannot. But for a similar problem, quadprog() will be faster. For example
H = [1 -1; -1 2];
f = [-2; -6];
A = [1 1; -1 2; 2 1];
b = [2; 2; 3];
opts1 = optimoptions('quadprog', 'Display', 'off');
opts2 = optimoptions('fmincon', 'Display', 'off');
t1 = timeit(@() quadprog(H, f, A, b, [], [], [], [], [], opts1))
t2 = timeit (@() fmincon(@(x) 1/2*x.'*H*x+f.'*x, rand(2,1), A, b, [], [], [], [], [], opts2))
Result
>> t1
t1 =
8.3352e-04
>> t2
t2 =
0.0081
>> t2/t1
ans =
9.6923
quadprog() is about 10 times faster. You can also check that both fmincon() and quadprog() give same solutions.
更多回答(0 个)
另请参阅
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!