Static optimization using fmincon and quadprog
显示 更早的评论
Can anyone tell me which one os the optimization methods is faster between "fmincon" and "quadprog"? And why is it faster or slower?
Thanks in advance,
Raj Patel
采纳的回答
Ameer Hamza
2020-11-17
编辑：Ameer Hamza
2020-11-17
quadprog() is used for a very specific type of optimization problem and, therefore, can be optimized way more than fmincon(). However, note that there is no direct comparison since fmincon() can solve problems which quadprog() cannot. But for a similar problem, quadprog() will be faster. For example
H = [1 -1; -1 2];
f = [-2; -6];
A = [1 1; -1 2; 2 1];
b = [2; 2; 3];
opts1 = optimoptions('quadprog', 'Display', 'off');
opts2 = optimoptions('fmincon', 'Display', 'off');
t1 = timeit(@() quadprog(H, f, A, b, [], [], [], [], [], opts1))
t2 = timeit (@() fmincon(@(x) 1/2*x.'*H*x+f.'*x, rand(2,1), A, b, [], [], [], [], [], opts2))
Result
>> t1
t1 =
8.3352e-04
>> t2
t2 =
0.0081
>> t2/t1
ans =
9.6923
quadprog() is about 10 times faster. You can also check that both fmincon() and quadprog() give same solutions.
更多回答（0 个）
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Surrogate Optimization 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!
Translated by 
