Performance issues with readtable vs. xlsread
显示 更早的评论
I am working in R2020a and have converted the Excel file read in one of my MATLAB scripts from xlsread to readtable, since xlsread is now deprecated.
However, I am having performance issues with readtable compared to xlsread.
The Excel file is a 15MB .xlsb file with six sheets, and I am using named ranges to locate the data on the approrpriate sheet.
tic; [perforations, perforations_header] = xlsread(xls_file,sheet,'PERFORATIONS'); toc
Elapsed time is 4.354259 seconds.
tic; T=readtable(xls_file,'Sheet',sheet,'Range','PERFORATIONS'); toc
Elapsed time is 15.777517 seconds.
perforations = table2array(T); perforations_header=T.Properties.VariableNames; toc
Elapsed time is 15.803216 seconds.
So, two questions:
(1) Any suggestions on how to improve performance for readtable?
(2) Despite xlsread being deprecated, it clearly performs better than readtable. Is there any downside with staying with xlsread?
My thanks!
Mike
P.s. Attached is a cut down version of the Excel .xlsb file. It contains two named ranges: 'PERFORATIONS' and 'CELLS'. The full file was too large to attach.
2 个评论
Walter Roberson
2020-12-3
Consider experimenting with readtable() with the 'UseExcel', true flag.
Mike
2020-12-3
采纳的回答
更多回答(0 个)
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Workspace Variables and MAT Files 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!