New user, help please!!!

2013 5 22
1 个回答
回答已采纳
4 次查看（30 天）

0 个投票

I keep getting this error using the mupad solver!!
equations:={eqn1,eqn2,...,eqn51}
unknowns:={var1,var2,...,var51}
solve(equations,unknowns)
Error: Illegal variable context [DOM_VAR]; during evaluation of 'solvelib::indets'
What should I do????

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论 隐藏 1更早的评论

Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek 2013-5-22
Give an example
John
John 2013-5-22
编辑：Walter Roberson 2013-5-22
system_1:={
yht-z*(gamma^(1/eta)*(lu)^((eta-1)/eta)+(1-gamma)^(1/eta)*(li)^((eta-1)/eta))^(eta/(eta-1))=0,
yft_s-z_s*ld=0,
yht-yh-yh_s=0,
yft_s-yf-yf_s=0,
y-(omega^(1/mu)*yh^((mu-1)/mu)+(1-omega)^(1/mu)*yf^((mu-1)/mu))^(mu/(mu-1))=0,
y_s-(omega_s^(1/mu_s)*yh_s^((mu_s-1)/mu_s)+(1-omega_s)^(1/mu_s)*yf_s^((mu_s-1)/mu_s))^(mu_s/(mu_s-1))=0,
yh-omega*ph^(-mu)*y=0,
yh_s-omega_s*(ph*q^(-1))^(-mu_s)*y_s=0,
yf-(1-omega)*(pf*q)^(-mu)*y=0,
yf_s-(1-omega_s)(pf)^(-mu_s)*y_s=0,
y-cu-ci-kap_u*vu-kap_i*vi=0,
y_s-cd_s-f*wi*q^(-1)*e-kap_d*vd=0,
wu*lu-cu=0,
(1-s)*(1-(ud/d))*wd_s+i*dif-cu_s-f*wi*q^(-1)*e=0,
dif-wi*q^(-1)*(1-(ui/i))+wd_s*(1-(ud/d))=0,
i-li-ui=0,
d-ld-ud=0,
i-(1-delta)*(i+e)=0,
f*wi*q^(-1)-(b*(1-delta))/(1-b*(1-delta))*dif=0,
s-lu-uu=0,
1-s-i-d=0,
mat_u-chi_u*uu^(1-ep_u)*vu^(ep_u)=0,
mat_i-chi_i*ui^(1-ep_i)*vi^(ep_i)=0,
mat_d-chi_d*ud^(1-ep_d)*vd^(ep_d)=0,
qu-mat_u/vu=0,
qi-mat_i/vi=0,
qd-mat_d/vd=0,
pu-mat_u/uu=0,
pi-mat_i/ui=0,
pd-mat_d/ud=0,
theta_u-vu/uu=0,
theta_i-vi/ui=0,
theta-d-vd/ud=0,
lu-(1-lam_u)*lu-mat_u=0,
li-(1-lam_i)*(1-delta)*li-mat_i=0,
ld-(1-lam_d)*ld-mat_d=0,
phi_u-b*(vmpl_u-wu+(1-lam_u)*phi_u)=0,
phi_i-b*(vmpl_i-wi+(1-lam_i)*(1-delta)*phi_i)=0,
phi_d-b*(vmpl_d-wd_s+(1-lam_d)*phi_d)=0,
kap_u-phi_u*qu=0,
kap_i-phi_i*qi=0,
kap_d-phi_d*qd=0,
vmpl_u-ph*z^((eta-1)/eta)*((yht/lu)*gamma)^(1/eta)=0,
vmpl_i-ph*z^((eta-1)/eta)*((yht/li)*(1-gamma))^(1/eta)=0,
vmpl_d-pf*z_s=0,
wi*li-q*r-ci=0,
q^(-1)*ci/i-cd_s/d=0,
cu_s-cd_s-q^(-1)*ci=0,
q-p/p_s=0,
ph-phn/p=0,
pf-pfn/p_s=0
}
vars_1:={
yht,yft_s,lu,li,ld,yh,yh_s,yf,yf_s,q,y,y_s,p,p_s,ph,pf,phn,pfn,cu,ci,cd_s,cu_s,i,d,e,mat_u,mat_i,mat_d,dif,qu,qi,qd,pu,pi,pd,theta_c,theta_i,theta_d,phi_u,phi_i,phi_d,uu,ui,ud,vu,vi,vd,r,vmpl_u,vmpl_i,vmpl_d
};
A:=Dom::Interval(0,1):
assume(omega in A and omega_s in A and f>=0 and s in A and delta in A and b in A and ep_u in A and ep_i in A and ep_d in A and chi_u>0 and chi_i>0 and chi_d>0 and lam_u in A and lam_i in A and lam_d in A and kap_u>=0 and kap_i>=0 and kap_d>=0):
assumeAlso(0<mat_i<=min(ui,vi) and 0<mat_u<=min(uu,vu) and 0<mat_d<=min(ud,vd) and yht>0 and yft_s>0 and z>0 and z_s>0 and lu in Dom::Interval(0,s) and li in Dom::Interval(0,i) and ld in Dom::Interval(0,d) and yh>0 and yh_s>0 and yf>0 and yf_s>0 and y>0 and y_s>0 and p>0 and p_s>0 and ph>0 and pf>0 and phn>0 and pfn>0 and cu>0 and ci>0 and cd_s>0 and cu_s>0 and wu>0 and wi>0 and wd_s>0 and i in Dom::Interval([0],[1-s]) and e<(1-s) and qu in A and qi in A and qd in A and pu in A and pi in A and pd in A and theta_u>0 and theta_i>0 and theta_d>0 and uu in Dom::Interval(0,s) and ui in Dom::Interval(0,i) and ud in Dom::Interval(0,d) and vu>=0 and vi>=0 and vd>=0 and r>=0);
solve(system_1, vars_1, Real);
Error: Illegal variable context [DOM_VAR];
during evaluation of 'solvelib::indets'
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013-5-22
You have (e.g.) 0<mat_i<=min(ui,vi) . Experiment with converting those into two-part ranges, such as 0<mat_i and mat_i <= min(ui,vi)

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

 采纳的回答

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013-5-22

0 个投票

(1-omega_s)(pf) is a function call. You missed a multiplication.

8 个评论
显示 6更早的评论 隐藏 6更早的评论

John
John 2013-5-22
thank you so much. a second pair of eyes is invaluable.
John
John 2013-5-22
Made the change, still getting the same error message. Any other ideas? What exactly does the error mean?
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013-5-23
Does the same thing happen if you skip the assumptions? What about if you leave out the "Real" ?
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013-5-23
Be careful with using 'e' as a variable name: it might get interpreted as exp(1)
John
John 2013-5-23
Same thing happens without the assumptions and if I leave out "Real"... I'll look into the e now. Thanks again.
John
John 2013-5-23
Just changed the 'e' to 'em' to no avail... I'm perplexed.
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013-5-23
I ran the system (without assumption) through Maple. I killed it off after 12+ hours of computation. It might be worth taking much smaller subsets of the equations and solving those and seeing how complicated it gets.
Also, places you have expressions such as
qu-mat_u/vu=0,
qi-mat_i/vi=0,
can be handled by removing those from the set of equations, and using (e.g.,)
subs(system_l, qi, mat_i/vi)
That is, if
qi-mat_i/vi=0
then
qi = 0 - (-mat_i/vi)
qi = mat_i/vi
so substitute mat_i/vi for qi in the rest of the expressions.
John
John 2013-5-23
Right, that's a good thought. My hope was that the assumptions would reduce computation time/number of cases, but perhaps not. I'll let you know if I make any progress. Thanks for all of the help.
- Tristan

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Get Started with MuPAD 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by