Solving symbolic equation using vpasolve
4 次查看(过去 30 天)
显示 更早的评论
syms Del theta
assume(Del,'real')
% assume(theta == 0);
% assume(theta>0 & theta<2*pi)
alpha = 1;
rho_0 = 0.5;
rho = 0.75;
q = 2;
s = 0;
kappa_0 = 1;
kappa_p = 0;
kappa = kappa_0+kappa_p*(rho-rho_0);
kappa_t = kappa+rho*kappa_p;
delta_0 = 0;
delta_p = 0;
delta = delta_0+delta_p*(rho-rho_0);
delta_t = delta+rho*delta_p;
R_0 = 3;
Del_shift = Del*(rho-rho_0);
R = R_0 - Del_shift + rho*(cos(theta)-delta*sin(theta)^2);
eps = rho_0/R_0;
D = kappa*rho*(cos(theta)*(cos(theta)-Del-delta_t*sin(theta)^2)+kappa_t/kappa*sin(theta)*(sin(theta)+delta*sin(2*theta)));
D_t = (cos(theta)*(cos(theta)-Del-delta_t*sin(theta)^2)+kappa_t/kappa*sin(theta)*(sin(theta)+delta*sin(2*theta)));
C = (sin(theta)+delta*sin(2*theta))*(cos(theta)-Del-delta_t*sin(theta)^2)-kappa*kappa_t*sin(theta)*cos(theta);
A_0 = kappa_0^2*cos(theta)^2+(sin(theta)+delta_0*sin(2*theta))^2;
%dRdrho = diff(R, rho);
dRdrho = cos(theta)-delta_0*sin(theta)^2-2*rho*delta_p*sin(theta)^2-rho_0*delta_p*sin(theta)^2;
E = 1/(pi)* int(-D*dRdrho*R_0/R^2, theta, 0, 2*pi);
F = 1/(2*pi)* int(D^3/(R*rho_0^2*A_0), theta, 0, 2*pi);
G_1 = 1/(2*pi)* int(D^3*R/(R_0^2*rho_0^2*A_0), theta, 0, 2*pi);
CBd = diff(C/(D*R), theta);
CB = CBd * (D*R/rho_0/A_0) + 2*(1/rho_0+(kappa_0*kappa_p*cos(theta)^2+(sin(theta)+delta_0*sin(2*theta))*sin(2*theta*delta_p))/A_0);
G_2 = 1/(2*pi)* int(D*rho_0/R*CB, theta, 0, 2*pi);
H = 1/(2*pi)* int(D_t*R_0/R, theta, 0, 2*pi);
L = kappa_0*eps*H;
SB = -alpha/(2*L) + (s*L/eps-E-G_2/eps+alpha*G_1/(2*L^2))/(L^2/q^2+F/L);
Sol = vpasolve(2*Del*(SB) -alpha*eps/L*(Del*eps-1-Del^2) -(2*delta_0-Del)/kappa_0*H +(1+eps*Del)/(1-eps^2)*L == 0, Del);
I need to solve a symbolic equation (last line of my code), but my code just runs forever. This equation must be solved for one variable only (Del).
However, this equation requires that I first derive some quantities: these contain the symbolic variable theta. I am not sure how to handle this and why my code fails.
My hypotheses are:
- The symbolic solutions I want to obtain before putting together the final equation are too complicated for Matlab;
- I am not setting theta to any value so the equation cannot be solved (how can I do this before solving but after integrating?);
- There is just something completely wrong in how I wrote my code.
Any ideas?
Edit: I debugged my code and found that the lines where I integrate to compute E, F, G1... return very weird solutions. I do not know what the problem may be though.
3 个评论
Walter Roberson
2021-4-21
Del = 9 exactly leads to unremovable singularities, but Del = 15 exactly looks like it might be an removable singularity.
Walter Roberson
2021-4-21
for G_2,
Del = 9 exactly to Del = 15 (not included) is -infinity, but Del = 15 exactly is +infinity
It looks like it might be finite outside those bounds.
回答(1 个)
Divija Aleti
2021-4-21
Hi Alessandro,
The "int" function cannot solve all integrals since symbolic integration is such a complicated task. It is also possible that no analytic or elementary closed-form solution exists.
In this case, the lines where you have to integrate to compute E,F,G1 etc., are returning unresolved integrals as no closed form solution exists. You can try approximating these integrals using numeric approximations.
For more information, have a look at the 'Tips' section of the following link:
Regards,
Divija
0 个评论
另请参阅
类别
在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Equation Solving 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!