Different results from radial averaging and averaging along x axis of fft2

3 次查看(过去 30 天)
I have an image(which is a height profile), and I apply 2D fft (fft2) on the data. Then I compute 2D power spectrum:
win=tukeywin(N,0.25)*tukeywin(M,0.25)';
z_win=z.*win;
Hm=fft2(z_win);
Cq=(a^2/(2*pi*N)^2).*((abs(fftshift(Hm))).^2);
Now, I radially average my power spectrum in order to get a 1D power spectrum from the 2D data.
Q1 : Why the value obtained here, differs with the value I gain if I do average data in x or y direction.
Q2 : What is the unit for radially averaged PSD? I should mention that the unit of my PSD is m^4. Is it m^4 or m^3 ? why? [frequency unit : 1/m]

回答(1 个)

Matt J
Matt J 2013-6-10
编辑:Matt J 2013-6-10
Q1: Because the PSD is not circularly symmetric? Is there a reason to expect it to be?
Q2: m^4. Averaging over quantities should not change their units, because it is done by adding things up with dimensionless weighting coefficients.
  5 个评论
Matt J
Matt J 2013-6-11
I don't really understand what you're saying these results reveal/explain. If your PSD is perfectly circularly symmetric, as you claim, I would expect to see identical results along x and y, possibly differing by floating point noise.
Mona Mahboob Kanafi
First, floating point error is not sth that could be considered a huge error. Second, I may forgot to mention the differences in results, slope of two curves I obtain from each methods are 0.8 for Rad Ave and 0.3 for the other. Anyway, I now understand the papers I previously read on this topic, so if you are interested you can also refer to the article below, or many other similar papers in this field. Thanks for everything.
'Using the Power Spectral Density method to characterise the surface topography of optical surfaces'

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Fourier Analysis and Filtering 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by