Interpolating non-independent values

I'm not really sure how to ask this in a concise enough way to find it elsewhere, so I'm just going to ask a new question.
I have two arrays of data, one with time and x values, and one with x and y values. I want to get the y values based on time, but the x values are not uniquely associated with y values.
tx = [0 0;
0.1 1;
0.2 2;
0.3 3;
0.4 2.5;
0.5 2.8;
0.6 2.6];
xy = [0 0;
0.5 0.1;
1 0.15;
1.5 0.2;
2.1 0.22;
2.7 0.3;
3 0.33;
2.6 0.37;
2.5 0.39;
2.7 0.42;
2.8 0.45;
2.6 0.5];
% I can interpolate the axial data to time easily.
x_proper = interp1(tx(:,1),tx(:,2),[0:0.05:0.6]);
% Interpolating with interp1 to get y data limits the y values to <= 0.33,
% because it doesn't understand the bounce in x values.
Here are the assumptions that can be made about the two datasets:
1) tx and xy are applicable over the same total time. Therefore tx([1,end],1) == time of xy([1,end],:)
2) The pattern of x in tx and in xy are matching, and share the same peaks and troughs
3) Due to the time nature of the dataset, each unique (x,y) set will correspond to a unique time

8 个评论

Well, clearly t=0.6 maps to both y=0.37 and y=0.5. What rule should be applied to resolve the ambiguity?
I think that's part of what I'm trying to figure out, syntaxically.
t = 0.6 does not map to y = 0.37 or y = 0.5 directly, but rather it maps directly to x = 2.6. The problem is that when a curve is drawn along the tx points there are four places where x can equal 2.6, but t = 0.6 and x = 2.6 only happens once, at the very end of the series. Therefore, at t = 0.6, y = 0.5, because that is also the last relationship between x and y. The other 'bounces' are much more difficult to logic.
It is assumed that both data sets cover the same total time, but not necessarily the same time intervals. I suppose I didn't make that clear before, but the xy data is technically time dependent, but the relationship is not directly known, which is why I'm trying to draw the relationships.
Is the sampling always equi-spaced in time? t(j+1)-t(j) is a constant independent of j?
It is assumed that both data sets cover the same total time, but not necessarily the same time intervals.
Does this mean t(end)-t(1) is the same in both data sets, but t(1) may vary?
It's the opposite of what you're thinking. t(end)- t(1) is constant, and t(1) is constant, but j is not a constant, so the sampling is not constant. I guess that's what I meant by 'interval'.
"j is not constant" looks like a typo. Because j is an index ranging over the length of the data set, it is obviously never going to be constant.
Do you mean that t(j+1)-t(j) is not constant over the data set? The sampling is not equi-spaced in time over a fixed data set?
If you had moderately tight upper and lower bounds on the time increments t(j+1)-t(j) then it might be possible to do something. Otherwise, I agree with John that it is a highly ill-posed problem.
Here are the assumptions that can be made about the two datasets:
It's basically a 1D image registration problem. The question is, what will be your deformation model...

请先登录,再进行评论。

回答(2 个)

x is non-monotonic as a function of time. I have no idea what you mean by bounce, but I assume it indicates the failure to be monotonic.
You can predict x as a function of time. But now you want to predict y as a function of x? How should MATLAB (or anyone, including me) know how to predict y? x does not vary in any kind of increasing order, so which value of x should be used to predict y? Sorry, but you are asking for something that is not posible.
xy = [0 0;
0.5 0.1;
1 0.15;
1.5 0.2;
2.1 0.22;
2.7 0.3;
3 0.33;
2.6 0.37;
2.5 0.39;
2.7 0.42;
2.8 0.45;
2.6 0.5];
plot(xy(:,1),xy(:,2),'o-')
xline(2.65);
Consider x = 2.65. Which of several (four possible) values of y should be predicted?Can the computer possibly know? Looking at it, I don't even know.

2 个评论

Clearly I did not communicate some of the subtext of the problem properly, please see the updated OP.
Yes, you did communicate that. What you did not communicate is how you can possibly know from one curve what to do with the second.

请先登录,再进行评论。

Matt J
Matt J 2021-3-29
编辑:Matt J 2021-3-30
Assuming you had moderately tight upper and lower bounds U and L on the time increments t(j+1)-t(j) of the xy data set, I can sort of see you attempting an inverse problem to solve for the unknown t(j) as follows.
Fx=griddedInterpolant(tx(:,1), tx(:,2),'spline');
tstart=tx(1,1);
tstop=tx(end,1);
xdata=xy(:,1);
ydata=xy(:,2);
N=numel(xdata)-2;
D=diff(speye(N),1,1); %differencing matrix
Aineq=[D;-D];
bineq=max(0, repelem([U;-L],N-1) );
lb=repelem(tstart,N-1,1);
ub=repelem(tstop,N-1,1);
t0=linspace(tstart,tstop,N+2);
t0([1,end])=[];
t=fmincon(@(t) norm(Fx(t(:))-xdata).^2, t0,Aineq,bineq,[],[],lb,ub,[]);
t=[tstart,t(:).',tstop];
Fy=griddedInterpolant(t,ydata,'spline');

类别

帮助中心File Exchange 中查找有关 Creating, Deleting, and Querying Graphics Objects 的更多信息

产品

版本

R2016b

标签

编辑:

2021-3-30

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by