Info

此问题已关闭。 请重新打开它进行编辑或回答。

bvp4c or classical odesolver

2 次查看(过去 30 天)
Moritz
Moritz 2013-7-23
关闭: MATLAB Answer Bot 2021-8-20
Hello,
i solved an initial BVP by the method of lines in the following way:
i=1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i),v(i+1))) + ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-Ax(i));
i=2:N-1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)+0.5*dx).*F(i)...
-(xcen(i)-0.5*dx).*F(i-1)) + 1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-2*Ax(i)+Ax(i-1));
i=N;
dvdt(i)= omega^2/dx*(xcen(end)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i-1),v(i)) - ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i)-Ax(i-1));
Is it better or probably faster to use bvp4c instead ? What are the reasons why i would like to use bvp4c and not the approach i used ?
Any comments are appreciated
Best Wishes
Moritz

回答(0 个)

此问题已关闭。

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by