Using Multistart with constrainted fmincon

27 次查看(过去 30 天)
Hey,
i want to optimize a constrainted function using fmincon. To find the global optimum, i found out that the use of MultiStart is helpful. My function looks like this
Here is my code for the use of fmincon
k = [5,7];
p = [1:4];
a = [pi/11, pi/7, pi/6, pi/3]; %Initial guesses
weights=(1./k.^4);
weights=weights/sum(weights);
fun = @(a) sqrt(sum( weights(:).*( 1 + 2*sum( (-1).^p.*cos(k(:).*a(p)) ,2) ).^2) );
A = [1, -1,0,0;0, 1, -1, 0; 0,0,1,-1]; % a1 < a2 < a3 ..
B = [0,0,0];
Aeq = [];
Beq = [];
lb = [0,0,0,0];
ub = [pi/4,pi/4,pi/4,pi/4];
function [c,ceq] = modindex(a,p) % saved as a seperate script
c = [];
ceq = 4/pi.*( 1 + 2*sum( (-1).^p.*cos(a(p)) ,2 ))-0.6;
end
nlcon = @(a) modindex(a,p); % this is a constraint, implemented as a function
x = fmincon(fun, a, A, B, Aeq, Beq, lb, ub,nlcon)
For the use of fmincon this code works, but now i want to run it with MultiStart. My question is how to respect all of my constraints?
My first try was this
problem = createOptimProblem('fmincon', 'objective', fun, 'x0', [pi/11, pi/7, pi/6, pi/3],'A', [1, -1,0,0;0, 1, -1, 0; 0,0,1,-1],...
'b',[0,0,0], 'Aeq', [], 'beq', [], 'lb', [0,0,0,0], 'ub', [pi/4,pi/4,pi/4,pi/4], 'nonlcon', @(a) modindex(a,p));
ms = MultiStart( 'UseParallel', 'allways', 'StartPointstoRun', 'bounds');
[x,f] = run(ms, problem, 10)
This doesnt work, "No field A exists for PROBLEM structure."
What does my code must look like, that all of the constraints are respected?
Kind regards

采纳的回答

Matt J
Matt J 2021-5-25
problem = createOptimProblem('fmincon', 'objective', fun, 'x0', [pi/11, pi/7, pi/6, pi/3],'Aineq', [1, -1,0,0;0, 1, -1, 0; 0,0,1,-1],...
'bineq',[0,0,0], 'Aeq', [], 'beq', [], 'lb', [0,0,0,0], 'ub', [pi/4,pi/4,pi/4,pi/4], 'nonlcon', @(a) modindex(a,p));
  21 个评论
Matt J
Matt J 2021-5-29
编辑:Matt J 2021-5-29
We can prove mathematically that the smallest value m can have is about 0.527393087579050.
First, because the sequence of are monotonic in [0,],
Therefore,
So, you cannot consider any m lower than this value.
Also, this is a tight lower bound, achieved for example by choosing and all other .
Meikel Vollmers
Meikel Vollmers 2021-5-31
Yeah, got it, youre right. Thats a mistake made in the paper i read. Matt, youre the best, thanks a lot!
I will replace the upper bound with pi/2 instead of pi/4. That will also guarantee the quater and halfwave symmetrie of my pulses.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(0 个)

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Solver Outputs and Iterative Display 的更多信息

产品


版本

R2020b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by