FSK using baseband modulation

8 次查看（过去 30 天）
al-comm
al-comm 2011-6-17
回答： Derek Eccles 2019-4-9
Hello,
I want to create a FSK modulator using the "*M-FSK Modulator Baseband*" block, the input is Bernoulli Binary Generator (0, 1) , but i cant get the good output ( 2 different frequencies ) on the scope in real time !!??
Block diagram : http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/854/blocks.jpg/
Good Output signal : http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/820/outputu.jpg/
Bad Output signal : http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/825/signalsk.jpg/
P.S : the output shown is bad because the frequency is the same whatever the input is 0 or 1. !!!
Thanks a lot,
Bye
  2 个评论
Rick Rosson
Rick Rosson 2011-6-17
Can you please post a screen shot showing the mask parameters (dialog box settings) of the 2-FSK modulator block? Thanks!
al-comm
al-comm 2011-6-19
Hello Rick,
Thanks for your comment and sorry for late, I’ve not received any notification for your comment,
Anyway, here are the mask parameters:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/225/setupx.jpg/
P.S: Even if I choose Binary or Gray the result is the same, and the sampling by symbol parameter does not give a good signal too …
This part is bugging my project,
Waiting for answer please,
Thanks again,

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Rick Rosson
Rick Rosson 2011-6-20
The output of the Simulink model is correct. The reason that it is not the same as the "Good Output signal" is that the Simulink signal is the complex baseband equivalent of the desired FSK signal, whereas the "Good Output signal" is the real-valued passband signal. Although these two signals are not the same, they are related.
In fact, you can generate the real-valued passband signal in the Simulink model by adding a handful of blocks that represent the passband modulation. To do so, multiply the output of the baseband modulator by a complex exponential at the desired passband frequency, and then view the real- and imaginary- parts on the scope.
HTH.
  3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论
Rick Rosson
Rick Rosson 2011-6-20
What are your specific questions?
Please let me know.
Thanks!
al-comm
al-comm 2011-6-20
Hello,
I see the difference between Baseband and Passeband, I’ve multiplied the baseband output modulator by complex exponential, but I still can’t see the good output...
My schematic:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/18/expt.jpg/
All parameters are kept the same, and I’ve tested the complex exponential with different frequencies from 10 Hz to 10 KHz…
Thanks a lot.

请先登录，再进行评论。

更多回答（2 个）

Rick Rosson
Rick Rosson 2011-6-21
You are getting closer to the right answer, but still not quite there yet. In your schematic, you are feeding the output of a real-valued sine wave to the input of the complex exponential function. So the output of the complex exponential block is:
exp(j*sin(2*pi*Fc*t))
where Fc represents the carrier frequency (in hertz). This modulation signal is not quite correct.
The correct output of the complex exponential should be:
exp(j*2*pi*Fc*t)
That means the input to the complex exponential function should be the simulation clock t feeding a gain block with a value of 2*pi*Fc.
Please give that a try.
Alternatively, I believe that you can generate a complex exponential output from the Sine Wave block. Please check the dialog box.
HTH.
Rick
  1 个评论
al-comm
al-comm 2011-6-21
Hello,
I got it Rick, thank you, and as you said I generated the complex signal from the sine wave …
Thanks a lot for your help.

请先登录，再进行评论。

Derek Eccles
Derek Eccles 2019-4-9
I am using a Math function block with the exp. function selected and the output data type as complex, to generate the carrier.
I then feed this to a complex to re-im block thinking this would get me the cosine and sine carriers which are required for 2_FSK.
The Im signal is a constant flat line, while the re signal is an exponential. Nothing like cosine or sine which I was hoping for ?

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 ASK 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by