Replacing for loop in the function
显示 更早的评论
Can someone please help me to remove this for loop in the function below and still get the same result that I get with loops?
Thanks alot in advance.
function I = func(f, a, b, n)
% Add description, name, date, inputs, outputs
h = (b-a)/n;
I = 0;
for j = 1:n
x = a + (j-0.5)*h;
I = I + h*f(x);
end
end
采纳的回答
See if ‘func2’ (without the loop) does what you want.
f = @(x) exp(-0.1*x) .* sin(2*pi*x);
a = -5;
b = 5;
n = 10;
I = func(f,a,b,n)
I = func2(f, a, b, n)
function I = func(f, a, b, n)
% Add description, name, date, inputs, outputs
h = (b-a)/n;
I = 0;
for j = 1:n
x = a + (j-0.5)*h;
I = I + h*f(x);
end
end
function I = func2(f, a, b, n)
h = (b-a)/n;
j = 1:n;
x = a + (j-0.5)*h;
I = sum(h*f(x));
end
Experiment to get different results.
.
2 个评论
Haider Ali
2021-9-8
Star Strider
2021-9-8
My pleasure!
If my Answer helped you solve your problem, please Accept it!
.
更多回答（2 个）
Rik
2021-9-8
1 个投票
What you want is not possible. Depending on what f is there might be ways to avoid the loop and use vector-operations instead, but a general solution is not possible.
It is a misconception that loops are always slower. They can be faster, especially when comparing to cellfun or arrayfun, which just hide the loop. The only situation where a loop is faster, is when there is a direct function. Instead of looping through a vector and using +, you can use sum. Or instead of nested loops you might be able to use conv.
For your case there isn't a general solution, because f is unknown, and the variables resulting in x are not guaranteed to result in a scalar.
Does f() accept a row vector as input? Does it reply a row vector or matrix then? If so:
function I = func(f, a, b, n)
h = (b - a) / n;
x = a + (0.5:(n - 0.5)) * h;
I = h * sum(f(x), 2);
end
类别
在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Loops and Conditional Statements 的更多信息
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!
Translated by 
