How to multiply two matrices

2011 11 24
4 个回答
回答已采纳
1 次查看（30 天）

0 个投票

Hello,
For example I would like to multiply the following two matrices:
A = rand([10,10,10]);
B = rand([10,10,10]);
defined by:
for i=1:size(A,3)
C(:,:,i)= A(:,:,i)*B(:,:,i);
end
The question is: is this possible without the use of a for loop? Kind regards, Carlas

2 个评论
显示 无 隐藏 无

umar siyab
umar siyab 2011-11-24
no its not possible without the use of loop because u have to multiply every element in the matrix with other matrix..
Jan
Jan 2011-11-24
What are the real dimensions in your problem? It matters if size(A, 3) is much larger or much smaller than size(A, 1) and size(A, 2).

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

 采纳的回答

Andrei Bobrov
Andrei Bobrov 2011-11-24

0 个投票

[m n p]= size(A);
o1 = ones(p,1));
out = cell2mat(cellfun(@mtimes,mat2cell(A,m,n,o1),mat2cell(B,m,n,o1),'un',0));
ADD
[m,n,p] = size(A);
out0 = bsxfun(@times,reshape(A,m,[]),reshape(permute(B,[1 3 2]),1,[],n));
out = reshape(sum(reshape(permute(out0,[1 3 2]),m,m,n,[]),3),m,n,[]);
or for out
out = permute(blockproc(out0,[m n],@(block_struct)sum(block_struct.data,2)),[1 3 2]);

更多回答（3 个）

Titus Edelhofer
Titus Edelhofer 2011-11-24

1 个投票

Hi Carlas,
probably yes. But in this case probably the loop is not your worst option, as long as you initialize
C = zeros(size(A,2), size(B,1), size(A,3));
before the loop.
Titus

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论 隐藏 -1更早的评论

Jan
Jan 2011-11-24
I do not completely agree with you, Titus: Instead of "not the worst" I'd claim, it is at least "very good". +1
James Tursa's MTIMESX (http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/25977-mtimesx-fast-matrix-multiply-with-multi-dimensional-support ) can handle such tasks efficiently.

请先登录，再进行评论。

carlas
carlas 2011-11-24

0 个投票

A = rand([10,10,10]);
[m n p]= size(A);
tic
o1 = ones(p,1);
out = cell2mat(cellfun(@mtimes,mat2cell(A,m,n,o1),mat2cell(A,m,n,o1),'un',0));
t1 = toc;
tic
C = zeros([10,10,10]);
for i=1:size(A,3)
C(:,:,i) = A(:,:,i)'*A(:,:,i);
end
t2 = toc;
xFaster = t2/t1
xFaster =
0.5072
The for loop is faster. Based on the above answers I assume that the for loop is the most optimal implementation if the final matrix is initialized. However, it is possible to do without.

1 个评论
显示 -1更早的评论 隐藏 -1更早的评论

Jan
Jan 2011-11-24
I definitely prefer the loop. Especially for large inputs it has a much smaller memory footprint than the CELL method. For A=rand(100,100,1000) the loop is 3 times faster.

请先登录，再进行评论。

类别

在 帮助中心 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Loops and Conditional Statements 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by