How can i use nchoosek to output both the k combinations and the remaining combinations?

18 次查看(过去 30 天)
I would like to run the nchoosek function and return all the k combinations as a matrix (which I can do already) but also the relavent remaining values in a separate matrix. A splitting process of all the values based on the k value.
For example if I nchoosek (where n=10 and k=4) it would output all combinations of 4 values in one matrix and all the remaining 6 values in another matrix.
Is this possible?

回答(4 个)

Paul Smits
Paul Smits 2019-4-26
Fastest solution so far is my rahter clumsy attempt at using logical indexing to solve the problem:
m = 10;
n = 4;
b = nchoosek(m,n);
ii = true(m,b);
ii(nchoosek(1:m,n)'+(0:m:m*b-1))=false;
xr = repmat([1:m]',1,b);
v = reshape(xr(~ii),n,b)';
w = reshape(xr(ii),m-n,b)';
Readability can be improved upon. But definitely fast.
Note that this method can also take input other than 1:m:
x = [8 8 8 6 1 2 3 4 10 4]; %other input
n = 4;
m = size(x,2);
b = nchoosek(m,n);
ii = true(m,b);
ii(nchoosek(1:m,n)'+(0:m:m*b-1))=false;
xr = repmat(x',1,b);
v = reshape(xr(~ii),n,b)';
w = reshape(xr(ii),m-n,b)';
Sidenote: A possibility for nchoosek to output remaining values directly would be quite a nice feature.
  1 个评论
Jan
Jan 2019-4-28
编辑:Jan 2019-4-29
I've posted a method, which avoid the 3 transpositions. I've tried to test it in Matlab Online without success for 15 minutes: Either the editing does not work, pressing the backspace key deletes the window, hitting Ctrl-Return executes one line only and not the complete code, etc. I gave up. Matlab Online is not working reliably. What a pity.

请先登录,再进行评论。


Jos (10584)
Jos (10584) 2019-4-28
编辑:Jos (10584) 2019-4-28
The remaining values can simply be obtained using nchoosek(1:n, n-k), you just have to flip the order of the output :-)
n = 7
k = 2
A = nchoosek(1:n, k)
remainingValues = flipud(nchoosek(1:n, n-k))
% a check that the combination contains all numbers
tf = sort([A remainingValues],2) == 1:n ;
all(tf(:)) % TRUE!
  3 个评论
Jos (10584)
Jos (10584) 2019-4-29
Thanks Jan :-)
You're right that the order is not documentd, but yet I think that for any decent algorithm the order of the output should not depend on K, so that nchoosek(1:N, K) and nchoosek(1:N, N-K) have to be symmetrical, in the sense that, for instance, [1 2 ... K] and [1 2 ... N-K] occupy the same row in both outputs (in my version row 1).

请先登录,再进行评论。


Jan
Jan 2019-4-26
% The loop version:
m = 10;
n = 4;
v = nchoosek(1:m, n);
nv = size(v, 1);
w = zeros(nv, m - n);
for k = 1:nv
t = 1:m;
t(v(k, :)) = [];
w(k, :) = t;
end
There must be a non-loop version also, but it will need larger temporary arrays.

Paul Smits
Paul Smits 2019-4-26
I tried a way without loops, using perms instead of nchoosek:
m = 10;
n = 4;
per = perms(1:m);
[v,iper,~]= unique(sort(per(:,1:n),2),'rows');
w = sort(per(iper,n+1:end),2);
Albeit shorter, this is significantly slower than Jan's solution. Gets real slow for m of 9 or higher.

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Get Started with MATLAB 的更多信息

标签

产品

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by