bsxfun seems to return too few values

Question

Lachlan 2016-7-28

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/297466-bsxfun-seems-to-return-too-few-values

编辑： Stephen23 2016-7-28

In Matlab 2016a, the following command behaves as I expect:

 >> bsxfun (@(x,y)((y-x)), [1], [3, 4])
 ans =
      2     3

However, this very similar command returns a scalar, instead of a 1x2 matrix:

 >> bsxfun (@(x,y)(min(y-x)), [1], [3, 4])
 ans =
      2

Am I right in assuming this is a bug in bsxfun? If so, how can I report it. If not, could someone please explain this behaviour?

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

KSSV 2016-7-28

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/297466-bsxfun-seems-to-return-too-few-values#answer_230021

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

bsxfun (@(x,y)((y-x)), [1], [3, 4])

It's output is 2, 3. The minimum value of (2,3) is 2..The second line

bsxfun (@(x,y)(min(y-x)), [1], [3, 4])

is giving you minimum value of the output....

I am using MATLAB2015a and I got the same result as said.

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Lachlan 2016-7-28

Ahh... I see now what the documentation means by "element-by-element function". I assumed that FUNC is called element-by-element, but it means that the answers are only sensible if applying FUNC to an array returns the same value as if it is applied element-by-element.

Thanks for your help.

Stephen23 2016-7-28

"I am using MATLAB2015a and I got the same result as said"

This does not answer the question "is this a bug?"

请先登录，再进行评论。

Answer 2

Stephen23 2016-7-28

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/297466-bsxfun-seems-to-return-too-few-values#answer_230027

编辑：Stephen23 2016-7-28

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

@Lachlan: this is a bug (or an undocumented "feature"), and you should report it. You can read how here:

http://www.mathworks.com/support/faq/bugreportsfaq.html

When you read the bsxfun documentation it clearly states that "A binary element-wise function of the form C = fun(A,B) accepts arrays A and B of arbitrary, but equal size and returns output of the same size. Each element in the output array C is the result of an operation on the corresponding elements of A and B only. fun must also support scalar expansion, such that if A or B is a scalar, C is the result of applying the scalar to every element in the other input array."

The function you provided does not fulfill these conditions, because it returns scalar when provided with a vector and a scalar:

>> fun = @(x,y)min(y-x);
>> fun(1, [3, 4])
ans =
     2

Note that scalar x was not expanded, as the documentation requires. So you are already using bsxfun outside of its documented functionality. The question is, what should bsxfun do when you provide an incorrect function that returns a scalar and not a vector?

By accepting this function and returning an undocumented output is at least misleading and at worst totally erroneous.