Why is subsref and subscripted reference not equivalent

1 次查看(过去 30 天)
Assume an struct array with the following content:
A = struct('b', {1, 2});
Following two code blocks do not give the same output:
[A.b]
ans =
1 2
and
S = struct('type', {'.'}, 'subs', {'b'});
[subsref(A, S)]
ans =
1
But I would say this two referencing methods are equal. What is the workaround for using subsref?
  3 个评论
Jan
Jan 2017-2-21
@Alexandra: B = struct('b', [1, 2]) creates a scalar struct, while the detail matters, that A = struct('b', {1, 2}) is a struct array.

请先登录,再进行评论。

回答(2 个)

Kenneth Eaton
Kenneth Eaton 2017-2-21
Not sure if this is a complete answer, but it appears that invoking subsref directly requires a stricter definition of the output arguments. While:
A.b
will automatically dump all possible output arguments in a comma separated list, calling subsref directly requires you to explicitly define how many output arguments you want. The only way I've figured out thus far to get them all is to collect them in a cell array of the appropriate size:
>> [out{1:numel(A)}]=subsref(A, S)
out =
1×2 cell array
[1] [2]
>> [out{:}]
ans =
1 2

Jan
Jan 2017-2-21
编辑:Jan 2017-2-21
Not an answer: I've played around with
S = struct('type', {'()', '.'}, 'subs', {{':'}, 'b'});
[subsref(A, S)]
because
[A.b]
is actually:
[A(:).b]
But this still replies 1 instead of the expected [1,2]. Then my interest in the question growed and I've voted for it. I expect, that there is a simple solution, by I cannot find it currently.

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Creating and Concatenating Matrices 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by