The name of the variable should not matter. Not that it is "varname" in every case here. But the name might be different in the caller. Nevertheless, relying on the name is a pitfall. Better create a specific variable, which carries the name:
data = 1:10;
name = 'My Data';
function abc(data, name)
plot(data);
title(sprintf('Graph of %s', name));
But beside this general advice to separate the program and the data strictly, there is a dirty command to do this:
function abc(data)
name = inputname;
if isempty(name)
name = 'unknown';
end
plot(data);
title(sprintf('Graph of %s', name));
The test for the empyt name is required when you call your function e.g. by:
abc(1:10)
Then there is no name, because the data are created dynamically. The same problem:
x = 1:10;
abs(x(2:7))
I'm not sure if inputname works here. Therefore I would not play with such meta-programming techniques, when providing a specified name as additional variable is such dry and clean.
Perhaps you can use a struct:
data.value = 1:10;
data.name = 'Voltage at point X'
data.unit = 'mV'
You see, this offers many elegant ways to keep the data and the meaning packed together. And the name is not restricted to allowed names of variables.
