quick search in two vectors

2 次查看(过去 30 天)
Yingke
Yingke 2012-5-16
There are 2 vectors with the same length va and vb ; We want to find out the index i where va(i) = m and vb(i) = n. Currently, we have 2 possible solutions:
1) index = find(va == m & vb == n);
2) mask = va == m; local_mask = vb(mask) == n; %we only need to look at part of vb here. msk = find(msk); index = msk(local_mask);
We think (after testing) that 2) is faster than 1).
Since we are intensively update va and vb, and make query every time, 2) is not good enough.
The length of va and vb is more than 1 million. They are not sorted. m and n are not constant.
So, is there any better solution? Thank you very much.
PS。construct sparse matrix or a hash table is too expensive for us.

采纳的回答

Jan
Jan 2012-5-16
A C-Mex does not have to create the large intermediate arrays for "tmp1 = va==m", "tmp2 = vb==n" and "tmp1 & tmp2". The algorithm is much easier, if there is an upper limit of the number of outputs:
#include "mex.h"
void mexFunction(int nlhs, mxArray *plhs[],
int nrhs, const mxArray *prhs[])
{
uint32_T *va, *vb, m, n, *out;
mwSize i, j, len;
const mwSize MaxOutLen = 1000;
mxArray* out_M;
mwSize dims[2];
// Read inputs:
va = (uint32_T *) mxGetData(prhs[0]);
m = *(uint32_T *) mxGetData(prhs[1]);
vb = (uint32_T *) mxGetData(prhs[2]);
n = *(uint32_T *) mxGetData(prhs[3]);
len = mxGetNumberOfElements(prhs[0]);
// Create output:
dims[0] = 1;
dims[1] = MaxOutLen;
plhs[0] = mxCreateNumericArray(2, dims, mxUINT32_CLASS, mxREAL);
out = (uint32_T) mxGetData(plhs[0]);
// Search for matching elements:
j = 0;
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (va[i] == m && vb[i] == n) {
out[j++] = i + 1;
if (j >= MaxOutLen) {
mexErrMsgTxt("*** MaxOutLen exceeded.");
}
}
}
// Crop unneeded elements, re-allocation
mxSetN(plhs[0], j);
return;
}
[EDITED, input type UINT32]
va = round(rand(1, 1e6) * 1000);
vb = round(rand(1, 1e6) * 1000);
tic
out1 = find(va == 3 & vb == 3);
toc
tic
out2 = myMexFcn(va, 3, vb, 3);
toc
Elapsed time is 0.012186 seconds.
Elapsed time is 0.004881 seconds.
  3 个评论
Jan
Jan 2012-5-17
Code changed to UINT32 type.

请先登录,再进行评论。

更多回答(2 个)

per isakson
per isakson 2012-5-16
strfind is a bit faster than find with whole numbers (floating integers, flints). The difference used to be larger. With R2012a 64bit:
>> n= randi( 1e5, [ 1, 1e6 ] );
tic, ix = find( n==17 ); toc
tic, ixsf = strfind( n, 17 ); toc
Elapsed time is 0.004021 seconds.
Elapsed time is 0.001884 seconds.
>> ix==ixsf
ans =
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  1 个评论
Yingke
Yingke 2012-5-17
I am using 2011b.
n= randi( 1e5, [ 1, 1e6 ] );
tic, ix = find( n==17 ); toc
tic, ixsf = strfind( n, 17 ); toc
Elapsed time is 0.006589 seconds.
Elapsed time is 0.004662 seconds.
strfind is only a little faster in this case. In my program it works even worse. If there is any other solution I will try 2012a. Thank you!!

请先登录,再进行评论。


Sean de Wolski
Sean de Wolski 2012-5-16
You might want to look at ismember() with the 'rows' flag. Keep column vectors vb, va together in one matrix as v. I don't know if this will be faster or not.
  1 个评论
Yingke
Yingke 2012-5-16
Thank you very much for your reply.
Unfortunately, ismember is slower than solution 1).
Anyway, thank you all the same.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Characters and Strings 的更多信息

标签

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by