fsolve + fminbnd combination... Problem !

1 次查看(过去 30 天)
Good evening to everybody. My problem is the following:
I want to solve a non-linear equation G(r)-(t-texp)=0 for the variable r with the following complications:
- r is in the upper limit of a definite integral of the integrand F(x).
-"texp" is a 1x10 array experimental points.
- t, which is another variable, are the minimums of another function H defined itself by G, H[t, G(r)].
I am not sure about the combination of algorithms that I must use. I have tried this scheme:
x0=ones(1,10)
rteor=@(r,t) fsolve(integral(G(x),1,r)-(t-texp),x0);
t = fminbnd(@(r,t) H,lb,up);
, but it does not work. I am almost sure fsolve is not well written. I have tried to make combinations with arrayfun inside fsolve, but with no success. I think it is a problem of dimensions and/or declaring variables. Can anybody help me please?
Thanks !!!
  2 个评论
Matt J
Matt J 2018-10-5
编辑:Matt J 2018-10-5
So r is a scalar and t is a function of r through the equation
t(r) = argmin_z H(z,G(r) )
That means you have 10 equations in one unknown, r. How do you expect to satisfy 10 different equations with only 1 degree of freedom?
Or, do you mean you are looking for 10 different r(i), corresponding to each texp(i) separately?
Sergio Quesada
Sergio Quesada 2018-10-6
编辑:Sergio Quesada 2018-10-6
Thank you for your answer, Matt. Yes, r is an scalar, and for each value of r, I want 10 different solutions G(r) - (texp-t) = 0, to be solve, each one for each value of texp. I call these solutions "rteor". I am trying this now:
rteor = @(r,t) fsolve(@(r) arrayfun (@(T) integral(F,1,r)-(T-t),texp), x0)
t = fminbnd(H(r,t),6e-3,t1-5e-5,options);
, with no results

请先登录,再进行评论。

回答(1 个)

Matt J
Matt J 2018-10-5
编辑:Matt J 2018-10-5
This might be what you want.
G=@(r) integral( @F,1,r);
t=@(r) fminbnd(@(z) H(z,G(r)),lb,up);
for i=1:10
r_solution(i) = fzero(@(r) G(r)-(t(r)-texp(i)) , r0 );
end
  11 个评论
Sergio Quesada
Sergio Quesada 2018-10-9
编辑:Sergio Quesada 2018-10-9
Yes, Matt. I am continous changing the program because I am trying to solve it. The problem is not muddled at all:
1- I have a collection of experimental points (texp, Iexp) that I want to fit.
2 - The equation I have is not I(t), but I[r_teor(t)], where r_teor(t) is in the form t(r_teor), being "r_teor" in an upper integration limit.
As simple as that. This is my last code tried:
nombre='C2';t0=6.00E-3;FC=4.24E-1;a=6.05;FD=8.17E-4;Io=15.53;V=25;
fID=fopen('Para_Leer_C2_2219_ptos.txt','r');
Columnexpi=1;Columnexpf=10;
formatSpec='%f %f'; sizeSpec=[2,Inf];
datos=fscanf(fID,formatSpec,sizeSpec); close('all');N=Columnexpf-Columnexpi+1;
texp=datos(1, Columnexpi:Columnexpf);Iexp=datos(2, Columnexpi:Columnexpf); t1=texp(1);
F=@(x) FC.*exp(-(V.*a)./(30.*x.*log(x))); part=1e-3;
for i=1:N
t=@(i) (1+(5.*((texp(i)-t0).^0.25)))
r_teor=@(i) fsolve(Int(r)-(t(i)-texp(i)), inpts(i),options);
L=@(r) 1:part:rteor(i);
me=@(r) arrayfun(F,L(r)); ue=@(r) F(max(L(r)));
Int=@(r) part.*(sum(me(r))-(ue(r)./2));
options = optimoptions('fsolve','Display','none');
Ifar=@(i)(FD./FC).*(r_teor(i).*exp((V.*a)./(30.*r_teor(i).*log(r_teor(i)))));
Itrans=@(i) Io./((r_teor(i)).^4);
Itotal=@(i) Ifar(i)+Itrans(i);
SumError=@(i) sum((Itotal(i)-Iexp).^2);
options = optimset('Display','iter','TolX',1e-4,'PlotFcns','@optimplotx');
t= fminbnd(SumError(i),6e-3,t1-5e-5,options);
end
Torsten
Torsten 2018-10-9
And you claim that
2 - The equation I have is not I(t), but I[r_teor(t)], where r_teor(t) is in the form t(r_teor), being "r_teor" in an upper integration limit.
is not muddled ? Nobody is able to understand what you write here.

请先登录,再进行评论。

类别

Help CenterFile Exchange 中查找有关 Calculus 的更多信息

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by