curve fitting with fminsearch

Question

Burak Akayoglu 2020-5-18

1
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/526389-curve-fitting-with-fminsearch

评论： Burak Akayoglu 2020-5-18

Hello all,

I'm trying to learn MATLAB and take a course for that, and i have a homework that i can't solve. I have experimental datas for x and y variables(total 11 each) and the question asks me to fit the datas by using 'fminsearch' .

Can anyone help me how can i find the best curve and write a proper code? Thank you

x=[3, 5, 7, 10, 13, 17, 20, 23, 25, 29, 31];
y=[1.1 , 2.0 , 3.7 , 9.0 , 22.2 , 73.8 , 181.5,446.5 , 813.6 , 2701.3 , 4922.1];

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Ameer Hamza 2020-5-18

编辑：Ameer Hamza 2020-5-18

Can you show what you have already tried? Even if you don't have a code, can you write down your understanding about solving this problem?

Burak Akayoglu 2020-5-18

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Well, i've tried to write those, but i know it's false.

In the question, x vs y datas are going to be fitted a curve (i think it's gonna be y= a*exp(bx) ) by using fminsearch, and find the parameters. I did it by using "cftool" but i couldnt do it with fminsearch. It would be great if you tell me how can i do that? thanks

f=@(x) a*exp(b*x);
x0=[2,1];
options = optimset('PlotFcns',@optimplotfval, 'Display','iter');
x = fminsearch(f,,x0,options)

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Ameer Hamza 2020-5-18

4
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/526389-curve-fitting-with-fminsearch#answer_433204

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

Study this example

x = [3, 5, 7, 10, 13, 17, 20, 23, 25, 29, 31];
y = [1.1 , 2.0 , 3.7 , 9.0 , 22.2 , 73.8 , 181.5,446.5 , 813.6 , 2701.3 , 4922.1];
f = @(a,b,x) a*exp(b*x);
obj_fun = @(params) norm(f(params(1), params(2), x)-y);
sol = fminsearch(obj_fun, rand(1,2));
a_sol = sol(1);
b_sol = sol(2);
figure;
plot(x, y, '+', 'MarkerSize', 10, 'LineWidth', 2)
hold on
plot(x, f(a_sol, b_sol, x), '-')

3 个评论
显示 1更早的评论隐藏 1更早的评论

John D'Errico 2020-5-18

编辑：John D'Errico 2020-5-18

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

This is what appears to be a reasonable fit. At the same time, it is often a good idea to plot things on a log scale when you have data that varies over such a wide range. Why?

If this model is truly an exponential one, then it will appear linear when plotted using semilogy. Effectively, this transforms the problem so that:

log(y) = log(a ) + b*x

And since we don't know what a is, then log of a is just as much an unknown constant.

P1 = polyfit(x,log(y),1)
P1 =
         0.300154799247339        -0.802338147307636

Now, we recover a by the simple transformation

a = exp(P1(2))
a =
         0.448279594078463
         
b = P1(1)
b =
         0.300154799247339

At the very least, these will be great starting estimates for a nonlinear search.

All of that applies for this simple model as chosen, IF that is a reasonable model. The nice thing is, polyfit is a good way to fit that data here.

semilogy(x,y,'o')
grid on

And, well, it looks about as close to linear as I could possibly imagine. But it is always right to confirm that with a plot.

The problem is, what if the curve at the bottom end tails off, or is not really truly an exponential one? For example, if we were to tweak those bottom data points a bit, they would still have absolutely no impact of the model parameters. This is because the fit will be dominated by the big numbers for the data on the top end.

The idea is that the standard least squares fit (here done using fminsearch) implies a normally distributed, additive error structure. However, when you have data like this, a proportional error structure is much more likely. And when you log the model, this implicitly transforms a proportional (lognormal) error stucture into a simple additive normal noise structure.

Other virtues of the use of polyfit here is that you don't need starting values at all, and there is no need to perform any iterative search. Iterative searches using exponential models can sometims be nasty things because of the exponentials. You need to have good starting values, else you may get divergence or infs - but polyfit has no need at all for them.

Simple rule: WHENEVER the data varies by more than an order of magnitude or more - ALWAYS check to see if logging the model agrees with the conclusion you would draw otherwise.

In any case, just about any way you fit this data, the line is so straight when you log y, you will get a decent answer. You cannot go wrong, at least not today. However, tomorrow is another day.

Ameer Hamza 2020-5-18

That a very useful observation. Many times differences in scale of the data points also make it difficult for optimizers to find an optimal solution. Such modifications can make things easy for the optimizer.

Burak Akayoglu 2020-5-18

Thankyou very much Ameer and John. Your answers help me a lot both solve the question and understand the concept. Thank you for your time and effort again.

请先登录，再进行评论。