Why the amplitude of the 90 shifted phase signal when use the analytic signal block is not equal to the original signal?

3 次查看（过去 30 天）

saleh shlimet 2020-6-7

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/544061-why-the-amplitude-of-the-90-shifted-phase-signal-when-use-the-analytic-signal-block-is-not-equal-to

评论： Walter Roberson 2020-6-20

I could manage to shift the phase of signal by 90 by using analytic signal block. But, the problem is that its amplitude is not equal to the original one. Can anyone please explain it?

8 个评论
显示 6更早的评论隐藏 6更早的评论

saleh shlimet 2020-6-8

I tried but it does not work

Walter Roberson 2020-6-8

Sorry, I do not know.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（1 个）

Jyotsna Talluri 2020-6-16

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/544061-why-the-amplitude-of-the-90-shifted-phase-signal-when-use-the-analytic-signal-block-is-not-equal-to#answer_452130

You can try variable phase shift block in simulink.

https://www.mathworks.com/help/simrf/ug/variable-phase-shift.html

6 个评论
显示 4更早的评论隐藏 4更早的评论

saleh shlimet 2020-6-20

this is a good idea if the frequency is constant, but in my case the frequency is changing.

Walter Roberson 2020-6-20

Suppose you leave the program running for two weeks. Then a frequency as low as one cycle per week could be detected, mathematically. That frequency has to have its phase shifted by 90 degrees, just like all the other frequencies do.Is it mathematically possible for something like a hilbert transform to properly predict when to make the appropriate output adjustments before the system has seen one cycle of the wave? Nyquist would say NO.

I would argue that it is therefore not possible to do what you want in a real-time system, unless

You put a lower-frequency boundary for detection (upper frequency is according to sampling frequency); and
You have a transport delay corresponding to one cycle of that low frequency.

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。