Please vote if you DO NOT want to have M-function in M-script

2 次查看（过去 30 天）

显示更早的评论

Fangjun Jiang 2011-5-18

4
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/7691-please-vote-if-you-do-not-want-to-have-m-function-in-m-script

回答： Jan 2017-1-28

The issue is raised in http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/7685-m-function-in-a-m-script

Or a previous discussion http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/298837

Vote if you want Mathworks NOT to add this feature.

If you like this feature, please vote on the other post. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/7690-please-vote-if-you-want-to-have-m-function-in-m-script

If you DON't CARE, you can also vote. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/7699-please-vote-if-you-don-t-care-to-have-m-function-in-m-script

11 个评论
显示 9更早的评论隐藏 9更早的评论

Sean de Wolski 2011-5-18

I think the points are only redeemable for Sam Adams.

Andrew Newell 2011-5-18

you cannot catch walter roberson...walter roberson is now matlab answers...if you try to catch him matlab answers will crush you...crush you...crush...

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

回答（3 个）

Jan 2011-5-18

1
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/7691-please-vote-if-you-do-not-want-to-have-m-function-in-m-script#answer_10590

+1: Better spend the time to improve the GUI objects - continuous slider callbacks, stable UITREE with supported context menu, sortable UITAB, let FIGURE(FigH) move the keyboard focus to the figure as claimed in the documentation (is this solved in 2011a?! It did not work from 5.3 to 2009a...), ComboBox (editable popup menu), stable GETFRAME (no need for PAUSE(0.02) to wait for drawing of Java objects), fix problems with OpenGL renderer (2% of the 2D plots with enabled Box miss the upper border), ...

0 个评论
显示 -2更早的评论隐藏 -2更早的评论

请先登录，再进行评论。

Walter Roberson 2011-5-18

1
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/7691-please-vote-if-you-do-not-want-to-have-m-function-in-m-script#answer_10645

The only time I use scripts is as temporary scratch-pads, pasting in code from questions in order to see what it does or to debug it. And all that does is save me the trouble of adding a "function" line at the top.

The Programming Theory part of me says that Mathworks should not do this: that instead they should work on allowing MATLAB to be "reflective" like Scheme; see here for more information on Reflection. (Disclaimer: I have met the inventor of Reflection in programming languages, and some of my friends worked directly with him in extending the ideas.)